GZUHY vs AMZN: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of Guangzhou R&F Properties Co Ltd ADR and Amazon Com Inc in 2026
GZUHY
Guangzhou R&F Properties Co Ltd ADR
$2.28
AMZN
Amazon Com Inc
$231.00
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | GZUHY | AMZN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $427.77M | $2.47T | AMZN |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 32.67 | AMZN |
| EPS (TTM) | $N/A | $7.07 | AMZN |
| Revenue Growth | -0.6% | 0.1% | AMZN |
| Gross Margin | -7.6% | 50.0% | AMZN |
Analyze GZUHY
Full quant analysis
Analyze AMZN
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GZUHY or AMZN a better investment?
Comparing GZUHY and AMZN: Guangzhou R&F Properties Co Ltd ADR has a market cap of $427.77M while Amazon Com Inc has $2.47T. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between GZUHY and AMZN?
GZUHY (Guangzhou R&F Properties Co Ltd ADR) and AMZN (Amazon Com Inc) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: GZUHY or AMZN?
Based on P/E ratios, compare detailed valuation metrics on our dashboard.
Which is growing faster: GZUHY or AMZN?
AMZN has higher revenue growth at 0.1% vs -0.6% for GZUHY.
Which company is more profitable: GZUHY or AMZN?
Amazon Com Inc (AMZN) has higher gross margins at 50.0% compared to -7.6% for GZUHY.
Which is the larger company: GZUHY or AMZN?
Amazon Com Inc (AMZN) is larger with a market cap of $2.47T compared to $427.77M for GZUHY.
Should I buy GZUHY or AMZN in 2026?
Both GZUHY and AMZN have investment merit. GZUHY trades at $2.28 while AMZN trades at $231.00. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between GZUHY and AMZN stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($427.77M vs $2.47T), P/E Ratio (N/A vs 32.7x), Revenue Growth (-0.6% vs 0.1%), Gross Margin (-7.6% vs 50.0%).