GZUHY vs GOOGL: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of Guangzhou R&F Properties Co Ltd ADR and Alphabet Inc in 2026
GZUHY
Guangzhou R&F Properties Co Ltd ADR
$2.28
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc
$321.10
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | GZUHY | GOOGL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $427.77M | $3.89T | GOOGL |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 23.14 | GOOGL |
| EPS (TTM) | $N/A | $8.18 | GOOGL |
| Revenue Growth | -0.6% | 13.9% | GOOGL |
| Gross Margin | -7.6% | 58.2% | GOOGL |
Analyze GZUHY
Full quant analysis
Analyze GOOGL
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GZUHY or GOOGL a better investment?
Comparing GZUHY and GOOGL: Guangzhou R&F Properties Co Ltd ADR has a market cap of $427.77M while Alphabet Inc has $3.89T. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between GZUHY and GOOGL?
GZUHY (Guangzhou R&F Properties Co Ltd ADR) and GOOGL (Alphabet Inc) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: GZUHY or GOOGL?
Based on P/E ratios, compare detailed valuation metrics on our dashboard.
Which is growing faster: GZUHY or GOOGL?
GOOGL has higher revenue growth at 13.9% vs -0.6% for GZUHY.
Which company is more profitable: GZUHY or GOOGL?
Alphabet Inc (GOOGL) has higher gross margins at 58.2% compared to -7.6% for GZUHY.
Which is the larger company: GZUHY or GOOGL?
Alphabet Inc (GOOGL) is larger with a market cap of $3.89T compared to $427.77M for GZUHY.
Should I buy GZUHY or GOOGL in 2026?
Both GZUHY and GOOGL have investment merit. GZUHY trades at $2.28 while GOOGL trades at $321.10. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between GZUHY and GOOGL stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($427.77M vs $3.89T), P/E Ratio (N/A vs 23.1x), Revenue Growth (-0.6% vs 13.9%), Gross Margin (-7.6% vs 58.2%).