CBGH vs AMZN: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of China YiBai United Guarantee International Holding Inc and Amazon Com Inc in 2026
CBGH
China YiBai United Guarantee International Holding Inc
$0.00
AMZN
Amazon Com Inc
$231.00
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | CBGH | AMZN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.78M | $2.47T | AMZN |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 32.67 | AMZN |
| EPS (TTM) | $N/A | $7.07 | AMZN |
| Revenue Growth | -1.0% | 0.1% | AMZN |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 50.0% | CBGH |
Analyze CBGH
Full quant analysis
Analyze AMZN
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CBGH or AMZN a better investment?
Comparing CBGH and AMZN: China YiBai United Guarantee International Holding Inc has a market cap of $1.78M while Amazon Com Inc has $2.47T. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between CBGH and AMZN?
CBGH (China YiBai United Guarantee International Holding Inc) and AMZN (Amazon Com Inc) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: CBGH or AMZN?
Based on P/E ratios, compare detailed valuation metrics on our dashboard.
Which is growing faster: CBGH or AMZN?
AMZN has higher revenue growth at 0.1% vs -1.0% for CBGH.
Which company is more profitable: CBGH or AMZN?
China YiBai United Guarantee International Holding Inc (CBGH) has higher gross margins at 100.0% compared to 50.0% for AMZN.
Which is the larger company: CBGH or AMZN?
Amazon Com Inc (AMZN) is larger with a market cap of $2.47T compared to $1.78M for CBGH.
Should I buy CBGH or AMZN in 2026?
Both CBGH and AMZN have investment merit. CBGH trades at $0.00 while AMZN trades at $231.00. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between CBGH and AMZN stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($1.78M vs $2.47T), P/E Ratio (N/A vs 32.7x), Revenue Growth (-1.0% vs 0.1%), Gross Margin (100.0% vs 50.0%).