CBGH vs MSFT: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of China YiBai United Guarantee International Holding Inc and Microsoft Corp in 2026
CBGH
China YiBai United Guarantee International Holding Inc
$0.00
MSFT
Microsoft Corp
$454.79
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | CBGH | MSFT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.78M | $3.38T | MSFT |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 36.30 | MSFT |
| EPS (TTM) | $N/A | $13.70 | MSFT |
| Revenue Growth | -1.0% | 14.9% | MSFT |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 68.8% | CBGH |
Analyze CBGH
Full quant analysis
Analyze MSFT
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CBGH or MSFT a better investment?
Comparing CBGH and MSFT: China YiBai United Guarantee International Holding Inc has a market cap of $1.78M while Microsoft Corp has $3.38T. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between CBGH and MSFT?
CBGH (China YiBai United Guarantee International Holding Inc) and MSFT (Microsoft Corp) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: CBGH or MSFT?
Based on P/E ratios, compare detailed valuation metrics on our dashboard.
Which is growing faster: CBGH or MSFT?
MSFT has higher revenue growth at 14.9% vs -1.0% for CBGH.
Which company is more profitable: CBGH or MSFT?
China YiBai United Guarantee International Holding Inc (CBGH) has higher gross margins at 100.0% compared to 68.8% for MSFT.
Which is the larger company: CBGH or MSFT?
Microsoft Corp (MSFT) is larger with a market cap of $3.38T compared to $1.78M for CBGH.
Should I buy CBGH or MSFT in 2026?
Both CBGH and MSFT have investment merit. CBGH trades at $0.00 while MSFT trades at $454.79. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between CBGH and MSFT stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($1.78M vs $3.38T), P/E Ratio (N/A vs 36.3x), Revenue Growth (-1.0% vs 14.9%), Gross Margin (100.0% vs 68.8%).