ACGBY vs GS: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of Agricultural Bank of China PK and Goldman Sachs Group Inc in 2026
ACGBY
Agricultural Bank of China PK
$17.43
GS
Goldman Sachs Group Inc
$943.37
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | ACGBY | GS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $276.30B | $285.58B | GS |
| P/E Ratio | 6.18 | 18.40 | ACGBY |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.80 | $51.27 | GS |
| Revenue Growth | 0.1% | 0.2% | GS |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 82.9% | ACGBY |
Analyze ACGBY
Full quant analysis
Analyze GS
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is ACGBY or GS a better investment?
Comparing ACGBY and GS: Agricultural Bank of China PK has a market cap of $276.30B while Goldman Sachs Group Inc has $285.58B. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between ACGBY and GS?
ACGBY (Agricultural Bank of China PK) and GS (Goldman Sachs Group Inc) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: ACGBY or GS?
Based on P/E ratios, ACGBY trades at a lower multiple (6.2x vs 18.4x).
Which is growing faster: ACGBY or GS?
GS has higher revenue growth at 0.2% vs 0.1% for ACGBY.
Which company is more profitable: ACGBY or GS?
Agricultural Bank of China PK (ACGBY) has higher gross margins at 100.0% compared to 82.9% for GS.
Which is the larger company: ACGBY or GS?
Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS) is larger with a market cap of $285.58B compared to $276.30B for ACGBY.
Should I buy ACGBY or GS in 2026?
Both ACGBY and GS have investment merit. ACGBY trades at $17.43 while GS trades at $943.37. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between ACGBY and GS stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($276.30B vs $285.58B), P/E Ratio (6.2x vs 18.4x), Revenue Growth (0.1% vs 0.2%), Gross Margin (100.0% vs 82.9%).