ACGBY vs MSFT: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of Agricultural Bank of China PK and Microsoft Corp in 2026
ACGBY
Agricultural Bank of China PK
$17.43
MSFT
Microsoft Corp
$454.50
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | ACGBY | MSFT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $276.30B | $3.38T | MSFT |
| P/E Ratio | 6.18 | 36.30 | ACGBY |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.80 | $13.70 | MSFT |
| Revenue Growth | 0.1% | 14.9% | MSFT |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 68.8% | ACGBY |
Analyze ACGBY
Full quant analysis
Analyze MSFT
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is ACGBY or MSFT a better investment?
Comparing ACGBY and MSFT: Agricultural Bank of China PK has a market cap of $276.30B while Microsoft Corp has $3.38T. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between ACGBY and MSFT?
ACGBY (Agricultural Bank of China PK) and MSFT (Microsoft Corp) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: ACGBY or MSFT?
Based on P/E ratios, ACGBY trades at a lower multiple (6.2x vs 36.3x).
Which is growing faster: ACGBY or MSFT?
MSFT has higher revenue growth at 14.9% vs 0.1% for ACGBY.
Which company is more profitable: ACGBY or MSFT?
Agricultural Bank of China PK (ACGBY) has higher gross margins at 100.0% compared to 68.8% for MSFT.
Which is the larger company: ACGBY or MSFT?
Microsoft Corp (MSFT) is larger with a market cap of $3.38T compared to $276.30B for ACGBY.
Should I buy ACGBY or MSFT in 2026?
Both ACGBY and MSFT have investment merit. ACGBY trades at $17.43 while MSFT trades at $454.50. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between ACGBY and MSFT stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($276.30B vs $3.38T), P/E Ratio (6.2x vs 36.3x), Revenue Growth (0.1% vs 14.9%), Gross Margin (100.0% vs 68.8%).