ACGBY vs GOOGL: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of Agricultural Bank of China PK and Alphabet Inc in 2026
ACGBY
Agricultural Bank of China PK
$17.43
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc
$321.10
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | ACGBY | GOOGL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $276.30B | $3.89T | GOOGL |
| P/E Ratio | 6.18 | 31.76 | ACGBY |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.80 | $10.14 | GOOGL |
| Revenue Growth | 0.1% | 0.2% | GOOGL |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 59.2% | ACGBY |
Analyze ACGBY
Full quant analysis
Analyze GOOGL
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is ACGBY or GOOGL a better investment?
Comparing ACGBY and GOOGL: Agricultural Bank of China PK has a market cap of $276.30B while Alphabet Inc has $3.89T. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between ACGBY and GOOGL?
ACGBY (Agricultural Bank of China PK) and GOOGL (Alphabet Inc) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: ACGBY or GOOGL?
Based on P/E ratios, ACGBY trades at a lower multiple (6.2x vs 31.8x).
Which is growing faster: ACGBY or GOOGL?
GOOGL has higher revenue growth at 0.2% vs 0.1% for ACGBY.
Which company is more profitable: ACGBY or GOOGL?
Agricultural Bank of China PK (ACGBY) has higher gross margins at 100.0% compared to 59.2% for GOOGL.
Which is the larger company: ACGBY or GOOGL?
Alphabet Inc (GOOGL) is larger with a market cap of $3.89T compared to $276.30B for ACGBY.
Should I buy ACGBY or GOOGL in 2026?
Both ACGBY and GOOGL have investment merit. ACGBY trades at $17.43 while GOOGL trades at $321.10. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between ACGBY and GOOGL stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($276.30B vs $3.89T), P/E Ratio (6.2x vs 31.8x), Revenue Growth (0.1% vs 0.2%), Gross Margin (100.0% vs 59.2%).