MLCMF vs AAPL: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of Millicom International Cellular S.A. and Apple Inc in 2026
MLCMF
Millicom International Cellular S.A.
$30.00
AAPL
Apple Inc
$246.86
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | MLCMF | AAPL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.01B | $3.66T | AAPL |
| P/E Ratio | 14.35 | 33.85 | MLCMF |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.09 | $7.55 | AAPL |
| Revenue Growth | -0.0% | 6.4% | AAPL |
| Gross Margin | 77.0% | 46.9% | MLCMF |
Analyze MLCMF
Full quant analysis
Analyze AAPL
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is MLCMF or AAPL a better investment?
Comparing MLCMF and AAPL: Millicom International Cellular S.A. has a market cap of $5.01B while Apple Inc has $3.66T. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between MLCMF and AAPL?
MLCMF (Millicom International Cellular S.A.) and AAPL (Apple Inc) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: MLCMF or AAPL?
Based on P/E ratios, MLCMF trades at a lower multiple (14.4x vs 33.8x).
Which is growing faster: MLCMF or AAPL?
AAPL has higher revenue growth at 6.4% vs -0.0% for MLCMF.
Which company is more profitable: MLCMF or AAPL?
Millicom International Cellular S.A. (MLCMF) has higher gross margins at 77.0% compared to 46.9% for AAPL.
Which is the larger company: MLCMF or AAPL?
Apple Inc (AAPL) is larger with a market cap of $3.66T compared to $5.01B for MLCMF.
Should I buy MLCMF or AAPL in 2026?
Both MLCMF and AAPL have investment merit. MLCMF trades at $30.00 while AAPL trades at $246.86. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between MLCMF and AAPL stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($5.01B vs $3.66T), P/E Ratio (14.4x vs 33.8x), Revenue Growth (-0.0% vs 6.4%), Gross Margin (77.0% vs 46.9%).