ABGSF vs GS: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA and Goldman Sachs Group Inc in 2026
ABGSF
ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA
$0.81
GS
Goldman Sachs Group Inc
$943.37
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | ABGSF | GS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $420.44M | $285.58B | GS |
| P/E Ratio | 13.49 | 18.40 | ABGSF |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.06 | $51.27 | GS |
| Revenue Growth | 0.2% | 0.2% | ABGSF |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 82.9% | ABGSF |
Analyze ABGSF
Full quant analysis
Analyze GS
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is ABGSF or GS a better investment?
Comparing ABGSF and GS: ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA has a market cap of $420.44M while Goldman Sachs Group Inc has $285.58B. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between ABGSF and GS?
ABGSF (ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA) and GS (Goldman Sachs Group Inc) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: ABGSF or GS?
Based on P/E ratios, ABGSF trades at a lower multiple (13.5x vs 18.4x).
Which is growing faster: ABGSF or GS?
ABGSF has higher revenue growth at 0.2% vs 0.2% for GS.
Which company is more profitable: ABGSF or GS?
ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA (ABGSF) has higher gross margins at 100.0% compared to 82.9% for GS.
Which is the larger company: ABGSF or GS?
Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS) is larger with a market cap of $285.58B compared to $420.44M for ABGSF.
Should I buy ABGSF or GS in 2026?
Both ABGSF and GS have investment merit. ABGSF trades at $0.81 while GS trades at $943.37. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between ABGSF and GS stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($420.44M vs $285.58B), P/E Ratio (13.5x vs 18.4x), Revenue Growth (0.2% vs 0.2%), Gross Margin (100.0% vs 82.9%).