ABGSF vs GOOGL: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA and Alphabet Inc in 2026
ABGSF
ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA
$0.81
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc
$322.00
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | ABGSF | GOOGL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $420.44M | $3.89T | GOOGL |
| P/E Ratio | 13.49 | 31.76 | ABGSF |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.06 | $10.14 | GOOGL |
| Revenue Growth | 0.2% | 0.2% | ABGSF |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 59.2% | ABGSF |
Analyze ABGSF
Full quant analysis
Analyze GOOGL
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is ABGSF or GOOGL a better investment?
Comparing ABGSF and GOOGL: ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA has a market cap of $420.44M while Alphabet Inc has $3.89T. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between ABGSF and GOOGL?
ABGSF (ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA) and GOOGL (Alphabet Inc) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: ABGSF or GOOGL?
Based on P/E ratios, ABGSF trades at a lower multiple (13.5x vs 31.8x).
Which is growing faster: ABGSF or GOOGL?
ABGSF has higher revenue growth at 0.2% vs 0.2% for GOOGL.
Which company is more profitable: ABGSF or GOOGL?
ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA (ABGSF) has higher gross margins at 100.0% compared to 59.2% for GOOGL.
Which is the larger company: ABGSF or GOOGL?
Alphabet Inc (GOOGL) is larger with a market cap of $3.89T compared to $420.44M for ABGSF.
Should I buy ABGSF or GOOGL in 2026?
Both ABGSF and GOOGL have investment merit. ABGSF trades at $0.81 while GOOGL trades at $322.00. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between ABGSF and GOOGL stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($420.44M vs $3.89T), P/E Ratio (13.5x vs 31.8x), Revenue Growth (0.2% vs 0.2%), Gross Margin (100.0% vs 59.2%).