CF earnings / call
CF Q3 2026 earnings call transcript, November 5, 2026
CF Industries Q3 2026 Earnings Conference Call
Key takeaways from this call : results vs expectations, guidance, what analysts asked
- Management 37%
- Andrew 13%
- Andrew Hill 4%
- Chris Bone 3%
- Martin Jarosik 0%
Management
Andrew Scribner
EVP and CFO
7 min
Andrew Hill
Management
2 min
Chris Bone
President
2 min
Martin Jarosik
Management
<1 min
Analysts · 10
<1 min
2 min
1 min
1 min
2 min
1 min
Transcribed automatically by Lician from the company's public webcast; it can contain errors and speaker names are best effort.
- Q&A10:35
This is CF Industries' first nine months and third quarter of 2026 conference call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. We will facilitate a question and answer session towards the end of the presentation. To pose a question at any time, please press star then one. on your touch-tone phone. I would now like to turn the presentation over to the host for today, Mr. Martin Jarosik with CF Investor Relations. Sir, please proceed.
Good morning, and thanks for joining the CF Industries Earnings Conference Call. With me today are Chris Bone, President, and Andrew Scribner.
...nine months and third quarter of 2026 yesterday afternoon. On this call, we'll review the results and answer session. Statements are not guaranteed a future for materially from what is...
More detailed information about factors that may affect our performance may be found in our filings with the SEC and between GAAP and non-GAAP measures in the press release and presentation posted on our website. Now, let me introduce Chris Bone.
Thanks, Martin.
And good morning, everyone. It's nine months of 2026 in which we generated adjusted EBITDA of approximately $3 billion. Our results reflect the strength of CF industry's operational performance and the structural advantages of our business.
12-month incident rate of 0.1 incidents, viable production. And high asset utilization since the beginning of the year at 97% utilization. Along with our consistency, we benefit from the structural advantages of our low cost on the global nitrogen cost curve supports our current $2.9 billion mid-cycle. While our low risk network with adjusted EBITDA through the way exceeding our mid-cycle translate into strongly
comprehensive EBITDA. The highest rate of the materials this gives us the final while returning capital began site
well in three billion study for our corporate diesel exhaust fluid return 1.3 billion to shareholders over the last 12 months through share repurchases and dividends total repurchases over the last three years
us to build on our track record nitrogen market environment remained constructive demand strengthened as the quarter progressed while supply remained constrained buying activity accelerated in north america south america and europe as deferred demand returned to the market corn and wheat values strengthened during the third quarter before giving back some of the gains in the fourth quarter at the same time nitrogen values remain below the peaks reached during spring applications we saw that demand pick up clearly in north america participation in our fall ammonia program sitting we expect fall ammonia volumes to be amongst our highest in the last 10 years are you and fill program also helped us ship nearly 2 million tons in the third quarter our largest quarterly uan volume this decade globally demand also remains robust india has maintained a steady pace of urea tenders exceed 10 million metric tons this year brazil has been slower to purchase in part because of credit farmer economics and demand with nitrogen inventories low across the global system including north america and southeast asia we believe substantial purchasing remains ahead on the supply side geopolitical disruptions remain a significant factor since hostilities began in the middle east in late february we estimate that the global market has lost approximately nine million metric tons of urea supply shipping availability
and significantly higher freight and insurance costs remain constraints russia is another source of uncertainty while production levels and plant availability are difficult to assess disruptions in the black sea shipping lanes have affected traditional routers remain under pressure european producers face challenging economics from high natural gas prices we believe thirty five percent of ammonia capacity in the region is curtailed additionally natural gas availability continues to constrain production in other regions chinese urea exports are helping to fill part of the global supply gap particularly into india but have not materially loosened the global nitrogen supply demand balance we expect the chinese government to continue to manage export levels in line with its domestic food security policies these against this backdrop we expect the global nitrogen supply demand balance to remain constructive into 2027 purchasing activity that was delayed earlier this year is now being realized global inventories remain low and meaningful portions of global production and trade remain constrained longer term our outlook has not changed nitrogen capacity currently under construction is not sufficient to meet global nitrogen demand growth expected permanent shutdowns through 2030 additionally the timeline and capital costs required to bring future capacity online have become longer and more challenging to support the structurally tighter global nitrogen environment through the end of the decade and reinforces the value of CF industries low cost low risk North American production and distribution network with that I'll turn the call over to Andrew
- AndrewManagement
through
the first time months of 2026 the company reported net earnings attributable to common stockholders were approximately 1.8 billion or $11.60 per diluted share EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA were both approximately 3 billion dollars net earnings attributable to common stockholders were 436 million dollars or $2.87 per diluted share EBITDA was $822 million and adjusted EBITDA was a continued convert EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA at a consistently high rate. A trillion 12 month net cash from operations was approximately $3.1 billion and free cash flow was approximately $2 billion. As you can see on slide 9, our EBITDA to free cash flow conversion has averaged approximately 60% over the last 5 years. Conversion over the last 12 months has been slightly lower due to $306 million of deposits related to a historical US-Canada transfer pricing matter dating back to 2012. These deposits limit the to $606 million. with additional interest in Canada while the matter is resolved between the two governments file amended US federal and state tax returns seeking refunds of related taxes with CF industry share at approximately $950 million structure of the blue point one ammonia plant is moving forward in line with our expectations the projected total cost remains $3.7 billion with ammonia production expected to commence in 2029 the cost of blue point common facilities also remains at our initial estimate of $550 million blue point one will be spread over three years is manageable given our consistently strong free cash flow generation we continue to return substantial capital to approximately 367
million dollars we discussed last quarter we believe the market continues to describe too much of our earnings and free cash flow performance to short-term geopolitical factors fine with the global nitrogen supply demand dynamics and CF industries mid-cycle earnings power we do not believe our earnings power is fully reflected in our valuation supporting our continued opportunistic share repurchases with that I'll hand it back to Chris
- Chris BonePresident
thanks Andrew I want to thank CF industries employees for their outstanding performance through the first nine months of 2026 our team is operating safely and executing exceptionally well while navigating significant disruption in the global nitrogen markets commitment to safety excellence our recordable incident rate at the end of the quarter was the lowest we've ever achieved as a company an award for safety excellence earned this year's award for the innovative approaches to safety they developed in changes in the global nitrogen market are reinforcing the value of CF industries low-cost low-risk North American asset base combined with our consistent operational execution distribution capabilities and industry lead
returns. As you can see on slide 10, our current growth projects combined with our existing share repurchase authorization are expected to increase nitrogen per share. These initiatives build and leave us well positioned to continue to create value for long-term shareholders.
- Operator
We will now begin the question-and-answer session. To ask a question, you may press star, then 1 on your touchtone phone.
The first question comes from Kristen Owen of Oppenheimer. Go ahead, please.
Question · Oppenheimer
Kristen OwenAnalyst · OppenheimerHi, good morning, and thank you for the question. I just wanted to start with sort of your long-term supply outlook. You know, you called out the 37% of European nameplate capacity that's currently curtailed. Just given the volatility in energy prices, never mind the absolute cost challenges, what's the structural settling out point, and has your view on the long-term supply backdrop changed?
- Management
Good morning, Kristen.
- Management
I would say our view has not changed. I think it's something that we've been talking about for quite a while. Uh, the only part that has changed... Our view, I should say, in the aggregate hasn't changed, is we believe it's going to accelerate from what we thought was a 2030 timeframe with some of those European shutdowns to occur, whether it be 12 months or 18 months, sooner than that, given the current dynamics that you discussed in the, you know, the energy volatility. So today we're seeing the 40% either offline or curtailed in Europe. And additionally, each quarter that... that this goes on makes it more and more challenging to start up that equipment because the capital costs that would be associated. And additionally, you know, to have fixed overhead absorption that continues and the work that's needed to keep that equipment in line to be started up at some unknown date is quite expensive. So I would say our position on the tightening in the global S&D market has been one that we have back all the way to 2020. It's just being accelerated now. That's also being compounded by what we're seeing in, you know, Russia, Ukraine with no true resolution there. And I would even say, you know, what we're seeing in the Middle East, even if there is some sort of resumption, it will take a while in order for that supply to begin flowing.
- Management
Thank you for that.
- Management
And my follow up is for Bert. I think you said fall application. And among the highest in 10 years, it's been a pretty dynamic year from a commodity price perspective. Obviously, pretty healthy crop this year, but just maybe some indications on how you're thinking about acreage in 2027 would be helpful. Thank you. So good morning. And the positive implications or directions in our fall ammonia program, which is one of the highest in 10 years, one, it has to weather. We always put in the caveat of weather dependent because. We're just starting the program now. We're movement in Canada and that's moving down into the Dakotas. And then we write the indications are with that corn planting in in 2027. What we're looking at is probably in line with what the other recommendations or indications are from the other players. 95 to 96 million acres could be elevated depending on pricing. Right now where corn is settling, one of the positive things for this year and for farm revenue is the settling of the crop revenue guarantee program.
- Management
A nice floor. For a farmer in today's economics and then interesting to see what's going to happen globally with yields due to I think some under applications of nutrients which we see as healthy in the ethanol and then therefore dry.
- Management
In 2027 which could drive acres even higher than the 90. I appreciate the time. Next question comes from Andrew Wong of RBC Capital Markets. Go ahead please.
Question · RBC Capital Markets
Andrew WongAnalyst · RBC Capital MarketsHey good morning.
Thanks for taking my questions.
Just curious your thoughts on how you see the setup on nitrogen the market today when you compare it to. Where we were last year you know it seems like we're in a tighter situation with a lot of things you've mentioned higher energy prices. We also see stronger crop prices. When you look at nitrogen prices and like I think in aggregate they're maybe only like 10 percent higher from where we were last year at this time. Like what's your thoughts on that and why do you think that is? Yeah I think you're correct in terms of your 10 percent. We were trading in the high 380s, probably 360s. The 380s last year and today trading at 430 for Q4 for a short, that's on a short ton for NOLA and I do see a positive market going forward. Just a lot of this demand that has been deferred is going to catch up and then you throw in like we've talked about a lack of supply and the first world countries that can pay and will pay as we go into the northern hemisphere planting and application seasons we see a robust demand coming and we're actually seeing that. for our uan programs and urea as well and so in 20 at least okay perfect and then maybe just between the different products you look at urea ammonia uan and we've seen more strength in ammonia and uan recently which i think is more reflective of what we've been seeing on european net gas but then urea seems to have lagged a bit right um like why do you think that is and do you expect some catch-up as well um on that gap there yeah when you look at the the global market in urea you're trading about four and a half to five million tons per month seaborne traded and i think with the chinese supply that has come in uh to kind of covering what has been lost from the middle east as i said in my prepared
- Management
remarks we've probably lost nine million tons and it's in our deck of what's been lost and what's been made up with different places and so as we're trending into the back half of this year in q4 i think the market's just in pause as you transition from hemispheres to hemispheres and planting and applications and building of supply but inventories are low i do see a positive movement for urea uan has been trading at a higher differential to urea at this time seven as well ammonia globally is more impacted you're correct on european demand and global demand for ammonia mentioned shutdowns and ammonia up higher in recent weeks
Question · RBC Capital Markets
Andrew WongAnalyst · RBC Capital Marketsokay thank you very much appreciate that the next question comes from james hooper of bernstein go ahead please
- Management
thank you very much taking my question how long do you think that the the northern hemisphere farmer can can wait before buying i mean are they looking at events this week thinking the iran war might end and they can hold on for for some time is that why pricing is only is only 10 higher than last year well i think you're seeing some indications of actual stepping in and buying our uam program from our retail friends has been sold down a lot to farmers and so that's a product we've already shipped and we've talked about the ammonia program has been sold down to farmers and i think ours and the other suppliers in the in united states and canada have also done and or had or have prepared a good program for fall which indicates again farmer uptake we will launch our spring program for ammonia post the application season this fall i think where you've seen some cutbacks in in p and k is a reflection of the higher price again nitrogen is a very good value and it's been reflected in purchasing i think the slowdown if you're taking the whole northern hemisphere and the slowdown in europe is a reflection of of just those natural gas costs and european producers of nitrogen those prices are much higher than in and just as a follow-up can you just expand a little bit more on where you see chinese urea exports going i mean it looks like this is the highest level in in ten years but do you think this could be a new normal or just a one-off we're helping india out
- Management
effectively there are two chinas there's the prilled urea producers and the granular urea producers what has helped stabilize the market in india and southeast asia has been the prilled supply which is generally not demanded in first tier first world markets and so if you extract the prilled supply out i would is is market at this point so chinese uh the export authorizations now total almost nine million tons so it is higher well under five million tons but again on a strange year with uh the limits out of the middle east it would make it made sense for china to open up a little bit more but it is consistent with i think what china has focused on is their own food security and food production and supply of fertilizers to their farmers on an economic basis and so i think that's the first and then excess that's next year six million seven million eight million
- Management
over ten years it would also require them to station over you know over a decade so i'm not so certain some of the eight to nine million tons of export that you know burp was talking about there don't move a little bit into early part of next calendar year as well and that's where maybe that bumps up against some of the domestic constraints that they're looking at doing there so a lot to keep our eye on with that but it would be quite a bit for them to export before the end of the year here.
- Management
Thank you very much.
- Operator
The next question comes from Joel Jackson of BMO Capital Markets. Go ahead please.
Question · BMO Capital Markets
Joel JacksonAnalyst · BMO Capital MarketsHi, I just want to get an update on Yazoo and would you expect the level of insurance you know in flow from Yazoo to be similar in Q4 and Q1 let's say as Q3 levels? First question. Yeah, so I'll let the numbers in the insurance part go to Andrew, but just on an overall update with Yazoo, our expectations are still that towards the end of the first half of next year that we will be starting to, as you recall, we've idled the ammonia, the nitric acid. And the AN plants there as we rebuild the AN supply. Additionally, we're looking at, as part of that reconfiguration, is building out some of the logistics and distribution attributes of the site to make it more flexible than what it's been in the past, being able to serve more customers. So we're excited about the next year, but I'll turn it over to Andrew Hill.
- Andrew HillManagement
Talk through a little bit more of the timing of insurance payments. Yeah, and hi, Joel. So the way that I would think about it is I would take a longer view, both the capital build and the timing of when the cash payments will go out at the end of this year and into next year, relative to the insurance pieces. What we expect is that the two are going to offset. So if you take a longer-term view and you kind of go through once we're complete with the rebuild and this is all wrapped up, we see that the two will largely offset. We're not trying to give guidance on what it's going to be. It's going to look like quarter over quarter, but I would say, you know, feel assured that that longer-term view will largely offset.
Okay, and then you're just a little bit of months into, you and your partners, into construction at BluePoint. Any observations or thoughts you want to share, you know, what you've learned so far about the project, things you're thinking about changing or any observations? Well, I would say we're in very early days relating to some significant milestones. Receiving the permits that were required. There's significant civil work that's ongoing down there. Our long lead items have been ordered. And, you know, we're looking to begin our module work at the, you know, beginning part of next year. I would say the learning is that I think we are fortunate we made the decision when we did on a timing basis. So we, if you think about it, we made FID 18. months ago, but about six months prior to that, we had put in orders on electrical gear, given we knew that to get in queue there was important. So we're really two years ahead on some of our ordering of equipment. And I would say if you were to announce a project today,
in completion of that. So I think when we did, and also the pre-ordering of some of that critical equipment prior to that. So I'll move on.
- Operator
The next question is Lucas Beaumont of UBS. Go ahead, please.
Thank you.
Good morning.
I just wanted to ask about the controllable non-gas costs. So they've sort of been running up about $200 million year-to-date, year-on-year, which is about a 12% increase. So I mean, it's been choppy quarter to quarter, but it's generally been higher. Could you just kind of talk us through the drivers there and how you see that evolving into the future? Fourth quarter and into next year. Thanks. Yeah.
Hi, Lucas.
- AndrewManagement
This is Andrew. Let me kind of talk you through Q3 because I think what you'll see Q3 was also consistent with Q2. And that will give you some context here. So if you look at Q3, our cost of sales were up 11%. If you tease out the impact of volume, it was up about 4%. You probably saw within the quarter we had some gas favorability. But I know what you're focused on is kind of what are some of those offsets. There were really three things that were coming through there, and I'll kind of put them in material. There's a couple of ones I want you to make connections on. So the biggest impact that we saw coming through was higher cost of purchase ammonia. And this is largely in support of our UK operations. Just keep in mind, we benefit from higher ammonia selling prices. And so there's kind of an overall, when you think about the overall P&L, that flows through our fixed costs, but it's not necessarily structurally disadvantageous to us in aggregate. The second piece is fixed cost absorption. We do have puts and takes between time. You know, turnarounds of this year versus last year, but the net of what's coming through is the Yazoo City rebuild that we're doing and the fixed costs. The other connection I want to make there is, you know, I know it would be intuitive potentially to say I'm going to tease out the impact of the insurance costs and just look at the fixed costs, but those two need to ride in tandem because that insurance recovery is in part to offset those higher fixed costs we're actually seeing coming through, and so I would kind of think about those two things together.
And then the third bucket, which is probably the smallest of the three, but it does have an impact, is dispersion and logistics, and there's two things happening within that. One, you do have some mode mix where we're seeing some shifting from barge into rail. That's really a function of our order book, but you do see some of those costs coming through from a mix standpoint. What you do see that's a little bit more sticky is you do see increases in rail itself and some fuel surcharges. But I think when you tease that out, what we've been seeing for the last couple of quarters, it's largely been the purchase of ammonia and the Yazoo City fixed costs flowing through has been the primary driver that you've been seeing come through.
Great, thanks. And then you mentioned that you've sort of seen Middle Eastern, your air exports, tracking at about half the levels they were previously sort of coming out of the region since the conflict began. Has that been trending over time? Is that improving? Is it slowing? Is it stable? And how do you kind of see the outlook there, short of us getting a full resumption in open trade? Thanks. So the middle, when hostilities began in late February and March, there were vessels that were trapped behind, unloaded or empty as well as loaded, that delayed months. So there was a period of time when it kind of opened up and things moved in May and June, and then obviously froze up again. And there's been a lot of vessels that have moved with transponders turned off. And so it's kind of difficult to track those. But outside of Oman, we're probably considering 500 to 550,000 tons per month has been exiting the Gulf and then throwing Oman on top.
Around 800,000 tons out of 1.5 to 1.7 normally per month. Iran has been moving some tons, but less than their previous capacities. And so when you consider that, you're probably losing 1,000 to 1 million tons per month out of the Gulf consistently. It's another question. What's the cost of going in and out of it? The Gulf today will take a long time, not only to untangle what's there, but for vessels to reposition themselves to load. And just the cost associated with freight, I would think it would take months. And then you've got to consider which of those plants are inoperable or operate. You're getting at a suboptimal rate due to some activities with drones or with inattention or maintenance. So I think those two or three things combined would say you're going to be four to six months if everything ended today.
- Operator
The next question comes from Adlane Rodriguez of Mizuho.
Question · Mizuho
Adlane RodriguezAnalyst · MizuhoThank you.
Good morning, everyone. I mean, just a philosophical question. So when you look at the overall ag complex, you know, corn prices have been down sharply since the last WASDE report. Whether it gets revised down or not next week, who knows? So farmers' income is under pressure. Like, what do you think this is doing to farmers' psychology and the willingness to pay higher prices? for crop inputs? Well, you have to start with the premise of that's the business. Farmers have to plant, yep. And so as coming from a farm family and with a lot of friends growing up in Kansas, that's just what you do. Now, relative to cost, there has been a lot of money from the federal government in the three tranches to support farm income. And then per my earlier comment about the crop guarantee or revenue guarantee program, 475 for harvest, it's much more attractive than where cash is today. So you have another kind of form of support around the world.
- Management
Probably some good opportunities in the forward market relative to the impact of El Nino around the world, the impact of lower nutrient levels utilized for the crop that's being put in the ground, and the stocks to use ratios that are in the market relative to demand being strong with ethanol and protein production. So in line to support crop prices, which then therefore support farmer income. And that's a knock on wood. Yeah, and I would just say from CF's perspective, you know, the area that we focus as we can globally by our production, and that's utilization rate at 97%, making consistent investments over the year.
- Management
And then increasing, you know, production. Whether it be through de-bottlenecks at our plants or even our distribution network in order to make certain that we can get the product to the farmer at the lowest cost and when they need it for application. The focus is really on the supply side of the S&D balance here in order to assist, you know, our end customer, the farmer.
- Operator
The next question comes from Ben Thurer of Barclays. Go ahead, please.
Question · Barclays
Ben ThurerAnalyst · BarclaysHey, good morning, Chris, Bert, Andrew.
Thanks for taking my question.
A lot's been talked about already on the supply side and obviously the ups and downs here, but I wanted to dig into one of the demand drivers, particularly Brazil and what you're expecting here for the next, call it one to two quarters. Trending. On a year-to-date basis in terms of imports, but you still have, at least based on your presentation, a pretty sizable uptick into the fourth quarter. So given the volatility of Brazilian politics, the BRL, the corn price and so on, as well as soybean prices, how confident are you about the level of potential uptake for urea in Brazil? That would be my first question. Yeah, I think with, uh, with the, Alley in Q3 that we saw in corn, if hedging had taken place at the $5 level, was pretty attractive.
- Management
Freeing, it gets planted generally late January through early March. And, but we are seeing constrained issue with the suppliers of, of nutrients have to, uh, you know, have long dated credit and getting prepaid that is delayed purchasing from the importers, which has delayed sales to the farmers. And so our estimates today is that probably a million tons compared to 2025. And overall with NPK, uh, probably down seven to 9 million tons of total fertilizer demand cut due to an inability to pay for it. And, and. in terms of being competitive and again, these credit, I think one of the. What the indicators are predicting is the impact when it's.
Question · Barclays
Ben ThurerAnalyst · BarclaysOK, and then my follow up question, maybe help us understand with this very big spread on gas prices and in Europe being at the high 20s, almost $30 MMBTU, obviously completely out of money where the prices are. So why why has that not driven higher prices globally just yet? Is it just because the demand's not there? Because of the supply from China, what what is what is holding back a better pricing, just given what the cost for the last producer, so to speak, is, versus what the cost for you guys is that has been very, very stable on a nine month basis? I think you have seen a supply contraction with our estimates of 35 percent of European production is either shut down or curtailed. And the impact then on ammonia, you've seen 100, 100, 200 African as well as North American ammonia moving towards Europe.
- Management
So the total global supply is lower. And I think you've seen some deferred purchasing around the world that is also probably not impacted. Supply hasn't had to move into those positions yet. So when you combine demand deferral globally with prompt demand in Europe, I think that's why we're not escalating in price to the level that probably you would expect.
- Management
Thanks for that.
- Operator
The next question comes from David Simmons of BNP Paribus. Go ahead, please.
Question · BNP Paribas
David SimmonsAnalyst · BNP ParibasHi, thanks. Yeah, just a question on the announcement of some of these modular ammonia plants coming internally in the U.S. Do you have any view on where those guys might land on the cost curve and whether it impacts distribution margins or if it's just a move of... removal of imports in favor of domestic production? Thanks. You know, some of these discussions that are coming through that the USDA had with expanding production that the top four producers were not eligible to participate in,
- Management
and really their... capital cost per ton that could happen. And then on some of the other announcements related to fields, you're looking at some pretty small bottlenecks, things that we look at through our network all the time to increase efficiency. And obviously, we believe, given our technical expertise, we can do that on a lower cost per ton than anybody else. But in the end, you know, those announcements, you're looking at sizes that are in the 50,000 to 150,000 ton. ranking here, where our blue point at minimum is going to be 1.5 million tons. So you're kind of, you know, just nipping around the edges from what it's going to do from the overall supply standpoint. And I think that just really touches why our view both near mid and long term on nitrogen, we're seeing demand, as Bert said, yes, there's some deferral effects yield with. The lack of nitrogen. So demand continues to grow. But we've seen not only what's happening with geopolitical, but European shutdowns occur. And then this lack of new supply being bid into the market. And then add on top of that, as I mentioned earlier, the duration to startup, you know, even though we hear these announcements of these smallers are not moving the needle to the tightness we're seeing in the global. and debalance, not only this year, but over the next several years. That's good. Thank you.
- Operator
The next question comes from Vincent Andrews of Morgan Stanley. Go ahead, please.
Question · Morgan Stanley
Vincent AndrewsAnalyst · Morgan StanleyThank you. I wanted to come back to Yazoo for a moment. At this point, when you're talking about first half of 27, does that mean at some point the complex will restart then? Or does that mean you think the ramp of the restart will be completed by the end of the first half? So any color you could provide on that would be helpful. Yeah, Vincent, that's a good question. Really, we're seeing that as the ramp begin at that particular time. It may be even slightly earlier than that as we start to bring up the ammonia plant, but then may take it down just given the amount of storage capacity. But obviously, this plant will have been down for basically about a year and a half. So our intention is to do that. The intention is in the first half of the year, we're ramping it up, doing it safely, making certain that we're able to, when the AN side is completely ready to go, that we can move into AN production in the second half of the year. In addition to that, also, as we're ramping it up, it would be looking at some of the construction on that logistics flexibility that we're looking at, whether that be through DEF loadout, ammonia loadout, et cetera. would be part of that. Okay. And then for Bert, another question on China, slightly different, though. We saw, I think it was last week, they're starting to put quotas on ammonia sulfate exports. So, obviously, urea is up more than we all thought, but AS, which had been something that they'd let kind of run wild the last few years,
- Management
now they seem to be holding back on that. Any thoughts on what's going on there?
- Management
Good morning, Vincent.
- Management
That was a surprise, I think. On top of the amazing amount of ammonium sulfate that has gone out in the world, over 20 million tons, and it's just been a replacement for urea, but I think it's related to sulfur and the cost of sulfur, the cost of production, and the need for sulfuric acid for other applications, and so that was just a tightening and a restriction of the ammonium sulfate to be produced or exported.
- Management
Thanks everyone.
- Operator
The next question comes from Chris Parkinson of Wolf Research. Go ahead, please.
Question · Wolfe Research
Chris ParkinsonAnalyst · Wolfe ResearchGreat.
Thank you so much.
Ever since summer, Philly, you've undergone, for all intents and purposes, looks like very solid demands through the fall in terms of reactions to that program, and you've seen a continuation of that in the price on a quarter-to-quarter basis. How are you thinking about building order books in the spring and ultimately maxing out your network on a net unit basis based on where prices reside, at least today? Thank you.
- Management
Hey, good morning, Chris.
- Management
And when you look at the summer fill program, Mike and the team have done a great job putting that out in early July, and the roll-up was very fast. We took over probably over 2 million tons of orders and have been shipping against that. And then in parallel, building the book through Q4, and now we're sold into Q1. And the pricing on that was, we started in the high, like $280, $290, and you saw that reflected in the positive price of $322 as an average price for Q3, and that has continued to escalate. One is a reflection of just the need for nitrogen. Two is a reflection of the global market and a kind of a
- Management
migration to UAN. Parallel to that, we've exported a lot less of UAN and have kept a lot more. One of our decision earlier in the year to keep tons for the North American farmer or the American farmer. We always compare between the nitrogen products and try to stay in relation, but we're seeing a very positive spring demand. I think coming, again, back to the corn acres that are going to be planted and applied, as well as what we expect to have a better corn price.
- Management
And just a quick follow-up, perhaps a slightly longer-term question, but, you know, a couple years ago, India, there were very brief talks about India trying to be, you know, independent on the Rhea side, which has been anything but over the last two years, and obviously have, I'd say, disappointed. production, obviously, a period of times, you know, over that frame. How are you kind of thinking about that market over the longer term in terms of market growth versus perhaps U.S. LNG contracts towards the end of this decade? Is that something where you're looking at it sustainably, let's say, in the high, you know, high singular millions in terms of the market, in terms of the import market? Do you see that declining slightly? Do you see it growing? Just trying to get kind of a grasp on how you're. Viewing the longer-term supply-demand dynamic based on them. Thank you. Yeah, so today India is, you know, approaching 40 million tons of total consumption and production of around 30 and imports of around 10 million tons. So imports have ranged between 5 to 10 million tons over the last several years. The Modi government has directed a Made in India program. They have built new plants. But those. Some of those that are gas supplied are expensive. So if you're paying the world price for natural gas today at $25 to $30 and you're competing against import urea, it makes much more economic sense to not operate those plants and import urea, especially from China, which is the cheapest source.
- Management
And they're a big buyer of prilled urea. So I would look at it in that range. There is a new plant coming on in 2027, about a million ton plant in India. That is slated to come into production. So I would make that range, or think about that range in that six to nine million tons into 2027. And then if gas prices are expensive, it should be on the high side.
- Operator
The next question comes from Matthew Dale of Bank of America. Go ahead, please.
Question · BofA Securities
Matthew DaleAnalyst · BofA SecuritiesYeah, come on.
Good morning.
Thanks. How are you seeing ammonia demand for phosphates transpire? Obviously, the last six months, one direction, but we're starting to see some capacity come back. So what do you expect there? And how do you think about the circular reference for price of ammonia and perhaps some of the ability for the phosphate players to actually restart?
- Management
Yeah, it's been a difficult road for the phosphate producers because of sulfur. The price of sulfur elevating to over $1,000 a ton. As an ammonia supplier, and we do supply some of the major producers and have very good relationships with them, and both contractually and spot tons we sell. And through conversations with them, we're expecting demand for ammonia to increase in 2027 based on two drivers. One, we expect sulfur to come back in line, maybe not back to historical values yet, but trending that way. As well as just overall demand for phosphates, which globally have been cut 20 or 30%. You've had under applications in all the major markets for phosphate, and that, again, eventually will have a yield impact and then an ability then to pay for phosphate. Probably more positive going into 2028 for ammonia demand from the phosphate.
- Management
Thanks. I'll pass it back.
- Operator
The next question comes from Salvatore Teano of KeyBank Capital Markets. Go ahead, please.
Question · KeyBanc Capital Markets
Salvatore TeanoAnalyst · KeyBanc Capital MarketsYes, thank you very much. Firstly, you made a comment before some of the higher costs you incurred outside of gas were due to higher shipping costs, but you focused on the netback. And on that front, I wanted to understand a little bit. With your Midwest corn belt ammonia operations, can you talk a little bit about what percent or what dollar amount of the spread between, say, NOLA ammonia price and Midwest is part of the cost of transportation and perhaps storage versus what kind of the premium netback you as a CF can get by having access to barges and a storage network? And also, can you shed some... is it exciting to what volume you ship to the Corn Belt kind of on an annual basis? So how we look at ammonia through the Midwest and the terminal system, we have our terminal distribution that is principally supplied by the Sunoco pipeline that starts in NOLA at our Donaldsonville plant and then intersects and then splits off into Indiana and Iowa up through Nebraska. And we ship about... 1.2 ammonia for corn applications or wheat would be about 1.3, 1.4 for CF. And so then we stair-step the cost economically advantage line and we maximize our volume through that. The next step is our barges, which we own and lease some, and we move up through our river served terminals. And then some are served by truck that as we moved excess... ammonia from maybe our Oklahoma system or extraneous tons. And yes, costs were up a little bit, but as Andrew said earlier, a lot of that is a reflection of the increased volume that we moved, and then we expect to receive as those tons go out.
- Management
and are applied, but also higher rates, as we've shown year after year.
- Management
location by location, to distribution facility by distribution facility, that there's never any type of curtailment from, you know, directly into our distribution system.
- Management
Perfect. And I wanted to ask a little bit about low-carbon ammonia. Can you refresh us firstly on where you stand with, you know, any sales commitments or volume commitments from Donaldsonville for whether it's ammonia or urea and the premiums that you had first disclosed a year ago? And are you seeing any new markets gaining traction? It seems like there have been some ammonia-powered vessels now that have been manufactured. Are you seeing anything there or the energy market incremental versus a few months ago? Yeah, so I'll start with the first part of your question. You know, Burt's team has done just a month-by-month significant volume, moved through a little over ammonia, applications that we're working through on UAN. So we're beginning to see UAN come through. Not only because of the sequestration we're doing with the CO2 on the ammonia production side, but also so that's a market that we just continue to see that once again just, you know, demonstrates the differentiation between our network and others in our space and really the leaders. That we're doing through the low carbon network. So we continue to build that book. Our expectation is next year with CBAM and some of the pending details on certification process getting worked out. We'll see that expand quite a bit more next question. Yes, our next question comes.
- Management
from Mazahir Mamadli of Rothschild & Company. Go ahead, please.
Question · KeyBanc Capital Markets
Salvatore TeanoAnalyst · KeyBanc Capital MarketsHi, thank you for taking my questions. Just a question on sort of high-level ag fundamentals. I'm curious to hear your opinion on the current crop price environment. Do you think the current new crop futures reflect the reality on the ground in terms of what verg earned? The yields could turn out for corn and other important crops? Regarding yield, we're almost an information taker as well. We do have our channel checks and different farmers we talk to. I am surprised by some of the farm yields or corn yields I'm hearing about in the northern tier, like in North Dakota on dry land, as well as the irrigated performance in Nebraska and Kansas. But overall, I was surprised on the USDA's revision compared to pro-farmer and some of the other information that came out. So whether we move from 181 average yield to 183, which is what's projected. But taking a step back and going from a global perspective, I do see a challenged market, again, weather-related, nutrient, lack of nutrient-related in South America, specific to Mato Grosso. There's a potential for yield cuts there. I think Argentina is expected to have adequate rains and performance. So when you take a step back on where we are on demand, I would hope to see corn values start to rally as we get into 2027.
- Management
Great. Thank you.
- Operator
Ladies and gentlemen, that is all the time we have for questions for today. I would like to turn the call back to Martin Jarosik for closing remarks.
- Martin JarosikManagement
Thanks, everyone, for joining us today. We look forward to seeing you at upcoming conferences.
The conference is now concluded.
- Operator
Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.