TBABF vs HON: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of Trelleborg AB (publ) and Honeywell International Inc in 2026
TBABF
Trelleborg AB (publ)
$36.25
HON
Honeywell International Inc
$233.55
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | TBABF | HON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9.07B | $147.99B | HON |
| P/E Ratio | 21.08 | 33.60 | TBABF |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.72 | $6.95 | HON |
| Revenue Growth | -0.0% | -0.0% | HON |
| Gross Margin | 37.0% | 36.9% | TBABF |
Analyze TBABF
Full quant analysis
Analyze HON
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is TBABF or HON a better investment?
Comparing TBABF and HON: Trelleborg AB (publ) has a market cap of $9.07B while Honeywell International Inc has $147.99B. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between TBABF and HON?
TBABF (Trelleborg AB (publ)) and HON (Honeywell International Inc) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: TBABF or HON?
Based on P/E ratios, TBABF trades at a lower multiple (21.1x vs 33.6x).
Which is growing faster: TBABF or HON?
HON has higher revenue growth at -0.0% vs -0.0% for TBABF.
Which company is more profitable: TBABF or HON?
Trelleborg AB (publ) (TBABF) has higher gross margins at 37.0% compared to 36.9% for HON.
Which is the larger company: TBABF or HON?
Honeywell International Inc (HON) is larger with a market cap of $147.99B compared to $9.07B for TBABF.
Should I buy TBABF or HON in 2026?
Both TBABF and HON have investment merit. TBABF trades at $36.25 while HON trades at $233.55. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between TBABF and HON stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($9.07B vs $147.99B), P/E Ratio (21.1x vs 33.6x), Revenue Growth (-0.0% vs -0.0%), Gross Margin (37.0% vs 36.9%).