PIM vs GS: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust and Goldman Sachs Group Inc in 2026
PIM
Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust
$3.28
GS
Goldman Sachs Group Inc
$900.00
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | PIM | GS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $157.56M | $267.08B | GS |
| P/E Ratio | 14.86 | 16.45 | PIM |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.22 | $54.72 | GS |
| Revenue Growth | -0.1% | 0.1% | GS |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 82.3% | PIM |
Analyze PIM
Full quant analysis
Analyze GS
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is PIM or GS a better investment?
Comparing PIM and GS: Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust has a market cap of $157.56M while Goldman Sachs Group Inc has $267.08B. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between PIM and GS?
PIM (Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust) and GS (Goldman Sachs Group Inc) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: PIM or GS?
Based on P/E ratios, PIM trades at a lower multiple (14.9x vs 16.4x).
Which is growing faster: PIM or GS?
GS has higher revenue growth at 0.1% vs -0.1% for PIM.
Which company is more profitable: PIM or GS?
Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust (PIM) has higher gross margins at 100.0% compared to 82.3% for GS.
Which is the larger company: PIM or GS?
Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS) is larger with a market cap of $267.08B compared to $157.56M for PIM.
Should I buy PIM or GS in 2026?
Both PIM and GS have investment merit. PIM trades at $3.28 while GS trades at $900.00. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between PIM and GS stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($157.56M vs $267.08B), P/E Ratio (14.9x vs 16.4x), Revenue Growth (-0.1% vs 0.1%), Gross Margin (100.0% vs 82.3%).