PHGPY vs COST: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of Pets at Home Group Plc and Costco Wholesale Corp in 2026
PHGPY
Pets at Home Group Plc
$11.28
COST
Costco Wholesale Corp
$999.89
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | PHGPY | COST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.25B | $443.82B | COST |
| P/E Ratio | 12.53 | 51.28 | PHGPY |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.90 | $19.50 | COST |
| Revenue Growth | -0.0% | 0.2% | COST |
| Gross Margin | 46.5% | 12.9% | PHGPY |
Analyze PHGPY
Full quant analysis
Analyze COST
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is PHGPY or COST a better investment?
Comparing PHGPY and COST: Pets at Home Group Plc has a market cap of $1.25B while Costco Wholesale Corp has $443.82B. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between PHGPY and COST?
PHGPY (Pets at Home Group Plc) and COST (Costco Wholesale Corp) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: PHGPY or COST?
Based on P/E ratios, PHGPY trades at a lower multiple (12.5x vs 51.3x).
Which is growing faster: PHGPY or COST?
COST has higher revenue growth at 0.2% vs -0.0% for PHGPY.
Which company is more profitable: PHGPY or COST?
Pets at Home Group Plc (PHGPY) has higher gross margins at 46.5% compared to 12.9% for COST.
Which is the larger company: PHGPY or COST?
Costco Wholesale Corp (COST) is larger with a market cap of $443.82B compared to $1.25B for PHGPY.
Should I buy PHGPY or COST in 2026?
Both PHGPY and COST have investment merit. PHGPY trades at $11.28 while COST trades at $999.89. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between PHGPY and COST stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($1.25B vs $443.82B), P/E Ratio (12.5x vs 51.3x), Revenue Growth (-0.0% vs 0.2%), Gross Margin (46.5% vs 12.9%).