MPWR vs QCOM: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of Monolithic Power Systems Inc and Qualcomm Incorporated in 2026
MPWR
Monolithic Power Systems Inc
$983.28
QCOM
Qualcomm Incorporated
$165.29
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | MPWR | QCOM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $46.33B | $178.35B | QCOM |
| P/E Ratio | 24.81 | 33.80 | MPWR |
| EPS (TTM) | $38.98 | $4.89 | MPWR |
| Revenue Growth | 0.2% | 0.1% | MPWR |
| Gross Margin | 55.2% | 55.4% | QCOM |
Analyze MPWR
Full quant analysis
Analyze QCOM
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is MPWR or QCOM a better investment?
Comparing MPWR and QCOM: Monolithic Power Systems Inc has a market cap of $46.33B while Qualcomm Incorporated has $178.35B. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between MPWR and QCOM?
MPWR (Monolithic Power Systems Inc) and QCOM (Qualcomm Incorporated) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: MPWR or QCOM?
Based on P/E ratios, MPWR trades at a lower multiple (24.8x vs 33.8x).
Which is growing faster: MPWR or QCOM?
MPWR has higher revenue growth at 0.2% vs 0.1% for QCOM.
Which company is more profitable: MPWR or QCOM?
Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) has higher gross margins at 55.4% compared to 55.2% for MPWR.
Which is the larger company: MPWR or QCOM?
Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) is larger with a market cap of $178.35B compared to $46.33B for MPWR.
Should I buy MPWR or QCOM in 2026?
Both MPWR and QCOM have investment merit. MPWR trades at $983.28 while QCOM trades at $165.29. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between MPWR and QCOM stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($46.33B vs $178.35B), P/E Ratio (24.8x vs 33.8x), Revenue Growth (0.2% vs 0.1%), Gross Margin (55.2% vs 55.4%).