MNSKY vs META: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of Moneysupermarket.com Group PLC and Meta Platforms Inc in 2026
MNSKY
Moneysupermarket.com Group PLC
$12.58
META
Meta Platforms Inc
$604.12
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | MNSKY | META | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.44B | $1.52T | META |
| P/E Ratio | 13.41 | 26.74 | MNSKY |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.82 | $22.59 | META |
| Revenue Growth | 0.0% | 0.3% | META |
| Gross Margin | 64.9% | 82.0% | META |
Analyze MNSKY
Full quant analysis
Analyze META
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is MNSKY or META a better investment?
Comparing MNSKY and META: Moneysupermarket.com Group PLC has a market cap of $1.44B while Meta Platforms Inc has $1.52T. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between MNSKY and META?
MNSKY (Moneysupermarket.com Group PLC) and META (Meta Platforms Inc) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: MNSKY or META?
Based on P/E ratios, MNSKY trades at a lower multiple (13.4x vs 26.7x).
Which is growing faster: MNSKY or META?
META has higher revenue growth at 0.3% vs 0.0% for MNSKY.
Which company is more profitable: MNSKY or META?
Meta Platforms Inc (META) has higher gross margins at 82.0% compared to 64.9% for MNSKY.
Which is the larger company: MNSKY or META?
Meta Platforms Inc (META) is larger with a market cap of $1.52T compared to $1.44B for MNSKY.
Should I buy MNSKY or META in 2026?
Both MNSKY and META have investment merit. MNSKY trades at $12.58 while META trades at $604.12. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between MNSKY and META stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($1.44B vs $1.52T), P/E Ratio (13.4x vs 26.7x), Revenue Growth (0.0% vs 0.3%), Gross Margin (64.9% vs 82.0%).