MNARF vs NVDA: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of Morguard North American Residential Real Estate Investment Trust and Nvidia Corp in 2026
MNARF
Morguard North American Residential Real Estate Investment Trust
$13.06
NVDA
Nvidia Corp
$179.55
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | MNARF | NVDA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $944.45M | $4.33T | NVDA |
| P/E Ratio | 5.18 | 44.08 | MNARF |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.52 | $4.04 | NVDA |
| Revenue Growth | 0.0% | 0.6% | NVDA |
| Gross Margin | 53.2% | 70.1% | NVDA |
Analyze MNARF
Full quant analysis
Analyze NVDA
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is MNARF or NVDA a better investment?
Comparing MNARF and NVDA: Morguard North American Residential Real Estate Investment Trust has a market cap of $944.45M while Nvidia Corp has $4.33T. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between MNARF and NVDA?
MNARF (Morguard North American Residential Real Estate Investment Trust) and NVDA (Nvidia Corp) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: MNARF or NVDA?
Based on P/E ratios, MNARF trades at a lower multiple (5.2x vs 44.1x).
Which is growing faster: MNARF or NVDA?
NVDA has higher revenue growth at 0.6% vs 0.0% for MNARF.
Which company is more profitable: MNARF or NVDA?
Nvidia Corp (NVDA) has higher gross margins at 70.1% compared to 53.2% for MNARF.
Which is the larger company: MNARF or NVDA?
Nvidia Corp (NVDA) is larger with a market cap of $4.33T compared to $944.45M for MNARF.
Should I buy MNARF or NVDA in 2026?
Both MNARF and NVDA have investment merit. MNARF trades at $13.06 while NVDA trades at $179.55. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between MNARF and NVDA stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($944.45M vs $4.33T), P/E Ratio (5.2x vs 44.1x), Revenue Growth (0.0% vs 0.6%), Gross Margin (53.2% vs 70.1%).