MLYS vs GOOGL: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of Mineralys Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock and Alphabet Inc in 2026
MLYS
Mineralys Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock
$31.93
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc
$322.00
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | MLYS | GOOGL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.53B | $3.89T | GOOGL |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 31.76 | GOOGL |
| EPS (TTM) | $N/A | $10.14 | GOOGL |
| Revenue Growth | 0.0% | 0.2% | GOOGL |
| Gross Margin | 0.0% | 59.2% | GOOGL |
Analyze MLYS
Full quant analysis
Analyze GOOGL
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is MLYS or GOOGL a better investment?
Comparing MLYS and GOOGL: Mineralys Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock has a market cap of $2.53B while Alphabet Inc has $3.89T. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between MLYS and GOOGL?
MLYS (Mineralys Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock) and GOOGL (Alphabet Inc) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: MLYS or GOOGL?
Based on P/E ratios, compare detailed valuation metrics on our dashboard.
Which is growing faster: MLYS or GOOGL?
GOOGL has higher revenue growth at 0.2% vs 0.0% for MLYS.
Which company is more profitable: MLYS or GOOGL?
Alphabet Inc (GOOGL) has higher gross margins at 59.2% compared to 0.0% for MLYS.
Which is the larger company: MLYS or GOOGL?
Alphabet Inc (GOOGL) is larger with a market cap of $3.89T compared to $2.53B for MLYS.
Should I buy MLYS or GOOGL in 2026?
Both MLYS and GOOGL have investment merit. MLYS trades at $31.93 while GOOGL trades at $322.00. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between MLYS and GOOGL stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($2.53B vs $3.89T), P/E Ratio (N/A vs 31.8x), Revenue Growth (0.0% vs 0.2%), Gross Margin (0.0% vs 59.2%).