MLGF vs WFC: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of Malaga Financial Corporation and Wells Fargo & Company in 2026
MLGF
Malaga Financial Corporation
$21.60
WFC
Wells Fargo & Company
$86.66
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | MLGF | WFC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $206.39M | $272.03B | WFC |
| P/E Ratio | 9.13 | 13.84 | MLGF |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.40 | $6.26 | WFC |
| Revenue Growth | -0.0% | 0.1% | WFC |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 100.0% | Tie |
Analyze MLGF
Full quant analysis
Analyze WFC
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is MLGF or WFC a better investment?
Comparing MLGF and WFC: Malaga Financial Corporation has a market cap of $206.39M while Wells Fargo & Company has $272.03B. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between MLGF and WFC?
MLGF (Malaga Financial Corporation) and WFC (Wells Fargo & Company) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: MLGF or WFC?
Based on P/E ratios, MLGF trades at a lower multiple (9.1x vs 13.8x).
Which is growing faster: MLGF or WFC?
WFC has higher revenue growth at 0.1% vs -0.0% for MLGF.
Which company is more profitable: MLGF or WFC?
Both companies show comparable profitability metrics. View the full comparison above for detailed analysis.
Which is the larger company: MLGF or WFC?
Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is larger with a market cap of $272.03B compared to $206.39M for MLGF.
Should I buy MLGF or WFC in 2026?
Both MLGF and WFC have investment merit. MLGF trades at $21.60 while WFC trades at $86.66. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between MLGF and WFC stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($206.39M vs $272.03B), P/E Ratio (9.1x vs 13.8x), Revenue Growth (-0.0% vs 0.1%), Gross Margin (100.0% vs 100.0%).