MKZR vs MSFT: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. Common Stock and Microsoft Corp in 2026
MKZR
MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. Common Stock
$4.65
MSFT
Microsoft Corp
$454.79
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | MKZR | MSFT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9.01M | $3.38T | MSFT |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 36.30 | MSFT |
| EPS (TTM) | $N/A | $13.70 | MSFT |
| Revenue Growth | -0.1% | 14.9% | MSFT |
| Gross Margin | 48.2% | 68.8% | MSFT |
Analyze MKZR
Full quant analysis
Analyze MSFT
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is MKZR or MSFT a better investment?
Comparing MKZR and MSFT: MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. Common Stock has a market cap of $9.01M while Microsoft Corp has $3.38T. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between MKZR and MSFT?
MKZR (MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. Common Stock) and MSFT (Microsoft Corp) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: MKZR or MSFT?
Based on P/E ratios, compare detailed valuation metrics on our dashboard.
Which is growing faster: MKZR or MSFT?
MSFT has higher revenue growth at 14.9% vs -0.1% for MKZR.
Which company is more profitable: MKZR or MSFT?
Microsoft Corp (MSFT) has higher gross margins at 68.8% compared to 48.2% for MKZR.
Which is the larger company: MKZR or MSFT?
Microsoft Corp (MSFT) is larger with a market cap of $3.38T compared to $9.01M for MKZR.
Should I buy MKZR or MSFT in 2026?
Both MKZR and MSFT have investment merit. MKZR trades at $4.65 while MSFT trades at $454.79. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between MKZR and MSFT stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($9.01M vs $3.38T), P/E Ratio (N/A vs 36.3x), Revenue Growth (-0.1% vs 14.9%), Gross Margin (48.2% vs 68.8%).