MKGAF vs JNJ: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of MERCK Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien and Johnson & Johnson in 2026
MKGAF
MERCK Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien
$152.12
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
$218.21
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | MKGAF | JNJ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $66.14B | $525.73B | JNJ |
| P/E Ratio | 19.23 | 21.10 | MKGAF |
| EPS (TTM) | $7.91 | $10.34 | JNJ |
| Revenue Growth | 0.0% | 0.1% | JNJ |
| Gross Margin | 58.9% | 68.4% | JNJ |
Analyze MKGAF
Full quant analysis
Analyze JNJ
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is MKGAF or JNJ a better investment?
Comparing MKGAF and JNJ: MERCK Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien has a market cap of $66.14B while Johnson & Johnson has $525.73B. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between MKGAF and JNJ?
MKGAF (MERCK Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien) and JNJ (Johnson & Johnson) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: MKGAF or JNJ?
Based on P/E ratios, MKGAF trades at a lower multiple (19.2x vs 21.1x).
Which is growing faster: MKGAF or JNJ?
JNJ has higher revenue growth at 0.1% vs 0.0% for MKGAF.
Which company is more profitable: MKGAF or JNJ?
Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) has higher gross margins at 68.4% compared to 58.9% for MKGAF.
Which is the larger company: MKGAF or JNJ?
Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) is larger with a market cap of $525.73B compared to $66.14B for MKGAF.
Should I buy MKGAF or JNJ in 2026?
Both MKGAF and JNJ have investment merit. MKGAF trades at $152.12 while JNJ trades at $218.21. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between MKGAF and JNJ stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($66.14B vs $525.73B), P/E Ratio (19.2x vs 21.1x), Revenue Growth (0.0% vs 0.1%), Gross Margin (58.9% vs 68.4%).