LULU vs COST: Which Stock is Better?

Side-by-side comparison of Lululemon Athletica Inc and Costco Wholesale Corp in 2026

Comparison Updated:

LULU

Lululemon Athletica Inc

$185.17

COST

Costco Wholesale Corp

$1010.79

Key Metrics Comparison

MetricLULUCOSTWinner
Market Cap$21.96B$448.75BCOST
P/E Ratio12.8754.05LULU
EPS (TTM)$14.39$18.70COST
Revenue Growth0.1%0.1%COST
Gross Margin58.4%12.9%LULU

Analyze LULU

Full quant analysis

Analyze COST

Full quant analysis

Analyze Each Stock

Frequently Asked Questions

Is LULU or COST a better investment?

Comparing LULU and COST: Lululemon Athletica Inc has a market cap of $21.96B while Costco Wholesale Corp has $448.75B. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.

What is the difference between LULU and COST?

LULU (Lululemon Athletica Inc) and COST (Costco Wholesale Corp) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.

Which stock has better value: LULU or COST?

Based on P/E ratios, LULU trades at a lower multiple (12.9x vs 54.1x).

Which is growing faster: LULU or COST?

COST has higher revenue growth at 0.1% vs 0.1% for LULU.

Which company is more profitable: LULU or COST?

Lululemon Athletica Inc (LULU) has higher gross margins at 58.4% compared to 12.9% for COST.

Which is the larger company: LULU or COST?

Costco Wholesale Corp (COST) is larger with a market cap of $448.75B compared to $21.96B for LULU.

Should I buy LULU or COST in 2026?

Both LULU and COST have investment merit. LULU trades at $185.17 while COST trades at $1010.79. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.

What are the key differences between LULU and COST stock?

Key differences: Market Cap ($21.96B vs $448.75B), P/E Ratio (12.9x vs 54.1x), Revenue Growth (0.1% vs 0.1%), Gross Margin (58.4% vs 12.9%).

Popular Stock Comparisons