IHG vs SBUX: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of Intercontinental Hotels Group Plc and Starbucks Corporation in 2026
IHG
Intercontinental Hotels Group Plc
$137.65
SBUX
Starbucks Corporation
$90.56
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | IHG | SBUX | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $20.74B | $102.98B | SBUX |
| P/E Ratio | 29.13 | 55.22 | IHG |
| EPS (TTM) | $4.73 | $1.64 | IHG |
| Revenue Growth | 0.1% | 0.1% | IHG |
| Gross Margin | 60.7% | 23.0% | IHG |
Analyze IHG
Full quant analysis
Analyze SBUX
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is IHG or SBUX a better investment?
Comparing IHG and SBUX: Intercontinental Hotels Group Plc has a market cap of $20.74B while Starbucks Corporation has $102.98B. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between IHG and SBUX?
IHG (Intercontinental Hotels Group Plc) and SBUX (Starbucks Corporation) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: IHG or SBUX?
Based on P/E ratios, IHG trades at a lower multiple (29.1x vs 55.2x).
Which is growing faster: IHG or SBUX?
IHG has higher revenue growth at 0.1% vs 0.1% for SBUX.
Which company is more profitable: IHG or SBUX?
Intercontinental Hotels Group Plc (IHG) has higher gross margins at 60.7% compared to 23.0% for SBUX.
Which is the larger company: IHG or SBUX?
Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) is larger with a market cap of $102.98B compared to $20.74B for IHG.
Should I buy IHG or SBUX in 2026?
Both IHG and SBUX have investment merit. IHG trades at $137.65 while SBUX trades at $90.56. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between IHG and SBUX stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($20.74B vs $102.98B), P/E Ratio (29.1x vs 55.2x), Revenue Growth (0.1% vs 0.1%), Gross Margin (60.7% vs 23.0%).