IHG vs CMG: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of Intercontinental Hotels Group Plc and Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc in 2026
IHG
Intercontinental Hotels Group Plc
$140.99
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc
$35.83
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | IHG | CMG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $21.25B | $46.39B | CMG |
| P/E Ratio | 29.25 | 30.77 | IHG |
| EPS (TTM) | $4.87 | $1.14 | IHG |
| Revenue Growth | 0.0% | 0.0% | CMG |
| Gross Margin | 61.9% | 40.1% | IHG |
Analyze IHG
Full quant analysis
Analyze CMG
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is IHG or CMG a better investment?
Comparing IHG and CMG: Intercontinental Hotels Group Plc has a market cap of $21.25B while Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc has $46.39B. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between IHG and CMG?
IHG (Intercontinental Hotels Group Plc) and CMG (Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: IHG or CMG?
Based on P/E ratios, IHG trades at a lower multiple (29.3x vs 30.8x).
Which is growing faster: IHG or CMG?
CMG has higher revenue growth at 0.0% vs 0.0% for IHG.
Which company is more profitable: IHG or CMG?
Intercontinental Hotels Group Plc (IHG) has higher gross margins at 61.9% compared to 40.1% for CMG.
Which is the larger company: IHG or CMG?
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc (CMG) is larger with a market cap of $46.39B compared to $21.25B for IHG.
Should I buy IHG or CMG in 2026?
Both IHG and CMG have investment merit. IHG trades at $140.99 while CMG trades at $35.83. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between IHG and CMG stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($21.25B vs $46.39B), P/E Ratio (29.3x vs 30.8x), Revenue Growth (0.0% vs 0.0%), Gross Margin (61.9% vs 40.1%).