GZUHF vs GOOGL: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of Guangzhou R&F Properties Co. Ltd and Alphabet Inc in 2026
GZUHF
Guangzhou R&F Properties Co. Ltd
$0.23
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc
$322.00
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | GZUHF | GOOGL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $863.04M | $3.89T | GOOGL |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 31.76 | GOOGL |
| EPS (TTM) | $N/A | $10.14 | GOOGL |
| Revenue Growth | -0.6% | 0.2% | GOOGL |
| Gross Margin | -7.6% | 59.2% | GOOGL |
Analyze GZUHF
Full quant analysis
Analyze GOOGL
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GZUHF or GOOGL a better investment?
Comparing GZUHF and GOOGL: Guangzhou R&F Properties Co. Ltd has a market cap of $863.04M while Alphabet Inc has $3.89T. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between GZUHF and GOOGL?
GZUHF (Guangzhou R&F Properties Co. Ltd) and GOOGL (Alphabet Inc) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: GZUHF or GOOGL?
Based on P/E ratios, compare detailed valuation metrics on our dashboard.
Which is growing faster: GZUHF or GOOGL?
GOOGL has higher revenue growth at 0.2% vs -0.6% for GZUHF.
Which company is more profitable: GZUHF or GOOGL?
Alphabet Inc (GOOGL) has higher gross margins at 59.2% compared to -7.6% for GZUHF.
Which is the larger company: GZUHF or GOOGL?
Alphabet Inc (GOOGL) is larger with a market cap of $3.89T compared to $863.04M for GZUHF.
Should I buy GZUHF or GOOGL in 2026?
Both GZUHF and GOOGL have investment merit. GZUHF trades at $0.23 while GOOGL trades at $322.00. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between GZUHF and GOOGL stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($863.04M vs $3.89T), P/E Ratio (N/A vs 31.8x), Revenue Growth (-0.6% vs 0.2%), Gross Margin (-7.6% vs 59.2%).