GTES vs HON: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of Gates Industrial Corp Plc and Honeywell International Inc in 2026
GTES
Gates Industrial Corp Plc
$23.98
HON
Honeywell International Inc
$235.29
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | GTES | HON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6.19B | $158.55B | HON |
| P/E Ratio | 26.64 | 31.04 | GTES |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.90 | $7.58 | HON |
| Revenue Growth | 0.0% | -0.0% | GTES |
| Gross Margin | 40.5% | 36.9% | GTES |
Analyze GTES
Full quant analysis
Analyze HON
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GTES or HON a better investment?
Comparing GTES and HON: Gates Industrial Corp Plc has a market cap of $6.19B while Honeywell International Inc has $158.55B. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between GTES and HON?
GTES (Gates Industrial Corp Plc) and HON (Honeywell International Inc) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: GTES or HON?
Based on P/E ratios, GTES trades at a lower multiple (26.6x vs 31.0x).
Which is growing faster: GTES or HON?
GTES has higher revenue growth at 0.0% vs -0.0% for HON.
Which company is more profitable: GTES or HON?
Gates Industrial Corp Plc (GTES) has higher gross margins at 40.5% compared to 36.9% for HON.
Which is the larger company: GTES or HON?
Honeywell International Inc (HON) is larger with a market cap of $158.55B compared to $6.19B for GTES.
Should I buy GTES or HON in 2026?
Both GTES and HON have investment merit. GTES trades at $23.98 while HON trades at $235.29. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between GTES and HON stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($6.19B vs $158.55B), P/E Ratio (26.6x vs 31.0x), Revenue Growth (0.0% vs -0.0%), Gross Margin (40.5% vs 36.9%).