FREGP vs GS: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp and Goldman Sachs Group Inc in 2026
FREGP
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp
$17.50
GS
Goldman Sachs Group Inc
$925.95
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | FREGP | GS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $7.03B | $267.08B | GS |
| P/E Ratio | 257.35 | 16.45 | GS |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.07 | $54.72 | GS |
| Revenue Growth | -0.1% | 0.1% | GS |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 82.3% | FREGP |
Analyze FREGP
Full quant analysis
Analyze GS
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is FREGP or GS a better investment?
Comparing FREGP and GS: Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp has a market cap of $7.03B while Goldman Sachs Group Inc has $267.08B. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between FREGP and GS?
FREGP (Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp) and GS (Goldman Sachs Group Inc) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: FREGP or GS?
Based on P/E ratios, GS trades at a lower multiple (16.4x vs 257.4x).
Which is growing faster: FREGP or GS?
GS has higher revenue growth at 0.1% vs -0.1% for FREGP.
Which company is more profitable: FREGP or GS?
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp (FREGP) has higher gross margins at 100.0% compared to 82.3% for GS.
Which is the larger company: FREGP or GS?
Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS) is larger with a market cap of $267.08B compared to $7.03B for FREGP.
Should I buy FREGP or GS in 2026?
Both FREGP and GS have investment merit. FREGP trades at $17.50 while GS trades at $925.95. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between FREGP and GS stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($7.03B vs $267.08B), P/E Ratio (257.4x vs 16.4x), Revenue Growth (-0.1% vs 0.1%), Gross Margin (100.0% vs 82.3%).