FIS vs MSFT: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of Fidelity National Information Services Inc and Microsoft Corp in 2026
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services Inc
$50.96
MSFT
Microsoft Corp
$397.23
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | FIS | MSFT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $26.62B | N/A | FIS |
| P/E Ratio | 159.25 | 36.30 | MSFT |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.32 | $13.70 | MSFT |
| Revenue Growth | 0.1% | 14.9% | MSFT |
| Gross Margin | 36.9% | 68.8% | MSFT |
Analyze FIS
Full quant analysis
Analyze MSFT
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is FIS or MSFT a better investment?
Comparing FIS and MSFT: Fidelity National Information Services Inc has a market cap of $26.62B while Microsoft Corp has N/A. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between FIS and MSFT?
FIS (Fidelity National Information Services Inc) and MSFT (Microsoft Corp) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: FIS or MSFT?
Based on P/E ratios, MSFT trades at a lower multiple (36.3x vs 159.3x).
Which is growing faster: FIS or MSFT?
MSFT has higher revenue growth at 14.9% vs 0.1% for FIS.
Which company is more profitable: FIS or MSFT?
Microsoft Corp (MSFT) has higher gross margins at 68.8% compared to 36.9% for FIS.
Which is the larger company: FIS or MSFT?
Fidelity National Information Services Inc (FIS) is larger with a market cap of $26.62B compared to N/A for MSFT.
Should I buy FIS or MSFT in 2026?
Both FIS and MSFT have investment merit. FIS trades at $50.96 while MSFT trades at $397.23. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between FIS and MSFT stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($26.62B vs N/A), P/E Ratio (159.3x vs 36.3x), Revenue Growth (0.1% vs 14.9%), Gross Margin (36.9% vs 68.8%).