DDHRF vs MSFT: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of Dream Hard Asset Alternatives Trust Units and Microsoft Corp in 2026
DDHRF
Dream Hard Asset Alternatives Trust Units
$1.42
MSFT
Microsoft Corp
$454.79
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | DDHRF | MSFT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $26.15M | $3.38T | MSFT |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 36.30 | MSFT |
| EPS (TTM) | $N/A | $13.70 | MSFT |
| Revenue Growth | 3.2% | 14.9% | MSFT |
| Gross Margin | 319.9% | 68.8% | DDHRF |
Analyze DDHRF
Full quant analysis
Analyze MSFT
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is DDHRF or MSFT a better investment?
Comparing DDHRF and MSFT: Dream Hard Asset Alternatives Trust Units has a market cap of $26.15M while Microsoft Corp has $3.38T. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between DDHRF and MSFT?
DDHRF (Dream Hard Asset Alternatives Trust Units) and MSFT (Microsoft Corp) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: DDHRF or MSFT?
Based on P/E ratios, compare detailed valuation metrics on our dashboard.
Which is growing faster: DDHRF or MSFT?
MSFT has higher revenue growth at 14.9% vs 3.2% for DDHRF.
Which company is more profitable: DDHRF or MSFT?
Dream Hard Asset Alternatives Trust Units (DDHRF) has higher gross margins at 319.9% compared to 68.8% for MSFT.
Which is the larger company: DDHRF or MSFT?
Microsoft Corp (MSFT) is larger with a market cap of $3.38T compared to $26.15M for DDHRF.
Should I buy DDHRF or MSFT in 2026?
Both DDHRF and MSFT have investment merit. DDHRF trades at $1.42 while MSFT trades at $454.79. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between DDHRF and MSFT stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($26.15M vs $3.38T), P/E Ratio (N/A vs 36.3x), Revenue Growth (3.2% vs 14.9%), Gross Margin (319.9% vs 68.8%).