CTRNF vs HON: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of CHAR Technologies Ltd and Honeywell International Inc in 2026
CTRNF
CHAR Technologies Ltd
$0.20
HON
Honeywell International Inc
$215.07
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | CTRNF | HON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $28.41M | $144.93B | HON |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 22.69 | HON |
| EPS (TTM) | $N/A | $9.48 | HON |
| Revenue Growth | -0.6% | 0.1% | HON |
| Gross Margin | 29.3% | 36.9% | HON |
Analyze CTRNF
Full quant analysis
Analyze HON
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CTRNF or HON a better investment?
Comparing CTRNF and HON: CHAR Technologies Ltd has a market cap of $28.41M while Honeywell International Inc has $144.93B. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between CTRNF and HON?
CTRNF (CHAR Technologies Ltd) and HON (Honeywell International Inc) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: CTRNF or HON?
Based on P/E ratios, compare detailed valuation metrics on our dashboard.
Which is growing faster: CTRNF or HON?
HON has higher revenue growth at 0.1% vs -0.6% for CTRNF.
Which company is more profitable: CTRNF or HON?
Honeywell International Inc (HON) has higher gross margins at 36.9% compared to 29.3% for CTRNF.
Which is the larger company: CTRNF or HON?
Honeywell International Inc (HON) is larger with a market cap of $144.93B compared to $28.41M for CTRNF.
Should I buy CTRNF or HON in 2026?
Both CTRNF and HON have investment merit. CTRNF trades at $0.20 while HON trades at $215.07. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between CTRNF and HON stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($28.41M vs $144.93B), P/E Ratio (N/A vs 22.7x), Revenue Growth (-0.6% vs 0.1%), Gross Margin (29.3% vs 36.9%).