CTHCF vs MSFT: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of Cathay Real Estate Development Co Ltd and Microsoft Corp in 2026
CTHCF
Cathay Real Estate Development Co Ltd
$1.40
MSFT
Microsoft Corp
$454.79
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | CTHCF | MSFT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $137.30M | $3.38T | MSFT |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 36.30 | MSFT |
| EPS (TTM) | $N/A | $13.70 | MSFT |
| Revenue Growth | 0.0% | 14.9% | MSFT |
| Gross Margin | 0.0% | 68.8% | MSFT |
Analyze CTHCF
Full quant analysis
Analyze MSFT
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CTHCF or MSFT a better investment?
Comparing CTHCF and MSFT: Cathay Real Estate Development Co Ltd has a market cap of $137.30M while Microsoft Corp has $3.38T. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between CTHCF and MSFT?
CTHCF (Cathay Real Estate Development Co Ltd) and MSFT (Microsoft Corp) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: CTHCF or MSFT?
Based on P/E ratios, compare detailed valuation metrics on our dashboard.
Which is growing faster: CTHCF or MSFT?
MSFT has higher revenue growth at 14.9% vs 0.0% for CTHCF.
Which company is more profitable: CTHCF or MSFT?
Microsoft Corp (MSFT) has higher gross margins at 68.8% compared to 0.0% for CTHCF.
Which is the larger company: CTHCF or MSFT?
Microsoft Corp (MSFT) is larger with a market cap of $3.38T compared to $137.30M for CTHCF.
Should I buy CTHCF or MSFT in 2026?
Both CTHCF and MSFT have investment merit. CTHCF trades at $1.40 while MSFT trades at $454.79. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between CTHCF and MSFT stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($137.30M vs $3.38T), P/E Ratio (N/A vs 36.3x), Revenue Growth (0.0% vs 14.9%), Gross Margin (0.0% vs 68.8%).