CICHF vs JPM: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of China Construction Bank Corp and Jpmorgan Chase & Co in 2026
CICHF
China Construction Bank Corp
$0.97
JPM
Jpmorgan Chase & Co
$302.74
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | CICHF | JPM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $273.74B | $824.14B | JPM |
| P/E Ratio | 5.26 | 15.13 | CICHF |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.19 | $20.01 | JPM |
| Revenue Growth | 0.0% | 0.0% | CICHF |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 100.0% | Tie |
Analyze CICHF
Full quant analysis
Analyze JPM
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CICHF or JPM a better investment?
Comparing CICHF and JPM: China Construction Bank Corp has a market cap of $273.74B while Jpmorgan Chase & Co has $824.14B. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between CICHF and JPM?
CICHF (China Construction Bank Corp) and JPM (Jpmorgan Chase & Co) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: CICHF or JPM?
Based on P/E ratios, CICHF trades at a lower multiple (5.3x vs 15.1x).
Which is growing faster: CICHF or JPM?
CICHF has higher revenue growth at 0.0% vs 0.0% for JPM.
Which company is more profitable: CICHF or JPM?
Both companies show comparable profitability metrics. View the full comparison above for detailed analysis.
Which is the larger company: CICHF or JPM?
Jpmorgan Chase & Co (JPM) is larger with a market cap of $824.14B compared to $273.74B for CICHF.
Should I buy CICHF or JPM in 2026?
Both CICHF and JPM have investment merit. CICHF trades at $0.97 while JPM trades at $302.74. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between CICHF and JPM stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($273.74B vs $824.14B), P/E Ratio (5.3x vs 15.1x), Revenue Growth (0.0% vs 0.0%), Gross Margin (100.0% vs 100.0%).