CICHF vs BAC: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of China Construction Bank Corp and Bank Of America Corp in 2026
CICHF
China Construction Bank Corp
$0.97
BAC
Bank Of America Corp
$52.10
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | CICHF | BAC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $273.74B | $380.46B | BAC |
| P/E Ratio | 5.26 | 13.67 | CICHF |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.19 | $3.81 | BAC |
| Revenue Growth | 0.0% | 0.1% | BAC |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 100.0% | Tie |
Analyze CICHF
Full quant analysis
Analyze BAC
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CICHF or BAC a better investment?
Comparing CICHF and BAC: China Construction Bank Corp has a market cap of $273.74B while Bank Of America Corp has $380.46B. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between CICHF and BAC?
CICHF (China Construction Bank Corp) and BAC (Bank Of America Corp) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: CICHF or BAC?
Based on P/E ratios, CICHF trades at a lower multiple (5.3x vs 13.7x).
Which is growing faster: CICHF or BAC?
BAC has higher revenue growth at 0.1% vs 0.0% for CICHF.
Which company is more profitable: CICHF or BAC?
Both companies show comparable profitability metrics. View the full comparison above for detailed analysis.
Which is the larger company: CICHF or BAC?
Bank Of America Corp (BAC) is larger with a market cap of $380.46B compared to $273.74B for CICHF.
Should I buy CICHF or BAC in 2026?
Both CICHF and BAC have investment merit. CICHF trades at $0.97 while BAC trades at $52.10. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between CICHF and BAC stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($273.74B vs $380.46B), P/E Ratio (5.3x vs 13.7x), Revenue Growth (0.0% vs 0.1%), Gross Margin (100.0% vs 100.0%).