BTT vs MSFT: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of Blackrock Municipal 2030 Target Term Trust and Microsoft Corp in 2026
BTT
Blackrock Municipal 2030 Target Term Trust
$22.61
MSFT
Microsoft Corp
$454.79
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | BTT | MSFT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.48B | $3.38T | MSFT |
| P/E Ratio | 24.85 | 36.30 | BTT |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.91 | $13.70 | MSFT |
| Revenue Growth | -0.0% | 14.9% | MSFT |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 68.8% | BTT |
Analyze BTT
Full quant analysis
Analyze MSFT
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is BTT or MSFT a better investment?
Comparing BTT and MSFT: Blackrock Municipal 2030 Target Term Trust has a market cap of $1.48B while Microsoft Corp has $3.38T. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between BTT and MSFT?
BTT (Blackrock Municipal 2030 Target Term Trust) and MSFT (Microsoft Corp) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: BTT or MSFT?
Based on P/E ratios, BTT trades at a lower multiple (24.8x vs 36.3x).
Which is growing faster: BTT or MSFT?
MSFT has higher revenue growth at 14.9% vs -0.0% for BTT.
Which company is more profitable: BTT or MSFT?
Blackrock Municipal 2030 Target Term Trust (BTT) has higher gross margins at 100.0% compared to 68.8% for MSFT.
Which is the larger company: BTT or MSFT?
Microsoft Corp (MSFT) is larger with a market cap of $3.38T compared to $1.48B for BTT.
Should I buy BTT or MSFT in 2026?
Both BTT and MSFT have investment merit. BTT trades at $22.61 while MSFT trades at $454.79. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between BTT and MSFT stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($1.48B vs $3.38T), P/E Ratio (24.8x vs 36.3x), Revenue Growth (-0.0% vs 14.9%), Gross Margin (100.0% vs 68.8%).