BTSDF vs WMT: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of Health and Happiness (H&H) International Holdings Limited and Walmart Inc in 2026
BTSDF
Health and Happiness (H&H) International Holdings Limited
$1.59
WMT
Walmart Inc
$118.71
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | BTSDF | WMT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $968.34M | $946.46B | WMT |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 41.51 | WMT |
| EPS (TTM) | $N/A | $2.86 | WMT |
| Revenue Growth | 0.0% | 0.1% | WMT |
| Gross Margin | 61.5% | 24.9% | BTSDF |
Analyze BTSDF
Full quant analysis
Analyze WMT
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is BTSDF or WMT a better investment?
Comparing BTSDF and WMT: Health and Happiness (H&H) International Holdings Limited has a market cap of $968.34M while Walmart Inc has $946.46B. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between BTSDF and WMT?
BTSDF (Health and Happiness (H&H) International Holdings Limited) and WMT (Walmart Inc) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: BTSDF or WMT?
Based on P/E ratios, compare detailed valuation metrics on our dashboard.
Which is growing faster: BTSDF or WMT?
WMT has higher revenue growth at 0.1% vs 0.0% for BTSDF.
Which company is more profitable: BTSDF or WMT?
Health and Happiness (H&H) International Holdings Limited (BTSDF) has higher gross margins at 61.5% compared to 24.9% for WMT.
Which is the larger company: BTSDF or WMT?
Walmart Inc (WMT) is larger with a market cap of $946.46B compared to $968.34M for BTSDF.
Should I buy BTSDF or WMT in 2026?
Both BTSDF and WMT have investment merit. BTSDF trades at $1.59 while WMT trades at $118.71. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between BTSDF and WMT stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($968.34M vs $946.46B), P/E Ratio (N/A vs 41.5x), Revenue Growth (0.0% vs 0.1%), Gross Margin (61.5% vs 24.9%).