ARWR vs GILD: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals Inc and Gilead Sciences Inc in 2026
ARWR
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals Inc
$70.53
GILD
Gilead Sciences Inc
$128.84
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | ARWR | GILD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9.82B | $160.44B | GILD |
| P/E Ratio | 43.83 | 19.04 | GILD |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.60 | $6.79 | GILD |
| Revenue Growth | 104.6% | 0.0% | ARWR |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 78.8% | ARWR |
Analyze ARWR
Full quant analysis
Analyze GILD
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is ARWR or GILD a better investment?
Comparing ARWR and GILD: Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals Inc has a market cap of $9.82B while Gilead Sciences Inc has $160.44B. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between ARWR and GILD?
ARWR (Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals Inc) and GILD (Gilead Sciences Inc) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: ARWR or GILD?
Based on P/E ratios, GILD trades at a lower multiple (19.0x vs 43.8x).
Which is growing faster: ARWR or GILD?
ARWR has higher revenue growth at 104.6% vs 0.0% for GILD.
Which company is more profitable: ARWR or GILD?
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals Inc (ARWR) has higher gross margins at 100.0% compared to 78.8% for GILD.
Which is the larger company: ARWR or GILD?
Gilead Sciences Inc (GILD) is larger with a market cap of $160.44B compared to $9.82B for ARWR.
Should I buy ARWR or GILD in 2026?
Both ARWR and GILD have investment merit. ARWR trades at $70.53 while GILD trades at $128.84. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between ARWR and GILD stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($9.82B vs $160.44B), P/E Ratio (43.8x vs 19.0x), Revenue Growth (104.6% vs 0.0%), Gross Margin (100.0% vs 78.8%).