ACGBF vs WFC: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of Agricultural Bank Of China and Wells Fargo & Company in 2026
ACGBF
Agricultural Bank Of China
$0.67
WFC
Wells Fargo & Company
$86.66
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | ACGBF | WFC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $255.94B | $272.03B | WFC |
| P/E Ratio | 6.09 | 13.84 | ACGBF |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.11 | $6.26 | WFC |
| Revenue Growth | 0.1% | 0.1% | ACGBF |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 100.0% | Tie |
Analyze ACGBF
Full quant analysis
Analyze WFC
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is ACGBF or WFC a better investment?
Comparing ACGBF and WFC: Agricultural Bank Of China has a market cap of $255.94B while Wells Fargo & Company has $272.03B. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between ACGBF and WFC?
ACGBF (Agricultural Bank Of China) and WFC (Wells Fargo & Company) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: ACGBF or WFC?
Based on P/E ratios, ACGBF trades at a lower multiple (6.1x vs 13.8x).
Which is growing faster: ACGBF or WFC?
ACGBF has higher revenue growth at 0.1% vs 0.1% for WFC.
Which company is more profitable: ACGBF or WFC?
Both companies show comparable profitability metrics. View the full comparison above for detailed analysis.
Which is the larger company: ACGBF or WFC?
Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is larger with a market cap of $272.03B compared to $255.94B for ACGBF.
Should I buy ACGBF or WFC in 2026?
Both ACGBF and WFC have investment merit. ACGBF trades at $0.67 while WFC trades at $86.66. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between ACGBF and WFC stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($255.94B vs $272.03B), P/E Ratio (6.1x vs 13.8x), Revenue Growth (0.1% vs 0.1%), Gross Margin (100.0% vs 100.0%).