ACGBF vs GS: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of Agricultural Bank Of China and Goldman Sachs Group Inc in 2026
ACGBF
Agricultural Bank Of China
$0.67
GS
Goldman Sachs Group Inc
$943.37
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | ACGBF | GS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $255.94B | $285.58B | GS |
| P/E Ratio | 6.09 | 18.40 | ACGBF |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.11 | $51.27 | GS |
| Revenue Growth | 0.1% | 0.2% | GS |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 82.9% | ACGBF |
Analyze ACGBF
Full quant analysis
Analyze GS
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is ACGBF or GS a better investment?
Comparing ACGBF and GS: Agricultural Bank Of China has a market cap of $255.94B while Goldman Sachs Group Inc has $285.58B. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between ACGBF and GS?
ACGBF (Agricultural Bank Of China) and GS (Goldman Sachs Group Inc) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: ACGBF or GS?
Based on P/E ratios, ACGBF trades at a lower multiple (6.1x vs 18.4x).
Which is growing faster: ACGBF or GS?
GS has higher revenue growth at 0.2% vs 0.1% for ACGBF.
Which company is more profitable: ACGBF or GS?
Agricultural Bank Of China (ACGBF) has higher gross margins at 100.0% compared to 82.9% for GS.
Which is the larger company: ACGBF or GS?
Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS) is larger with a market cap of $285.58B compared to $255.94B for ACGBF.
Should I buy ACGBF or GS in 2026?
Both ACGBF and GS have investment merit. ACGBF trades at $0.67 while GS trades at $943.37. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between ACGBF and GS stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($255.94B vs $285.58B), P/E Ratio (6.1x vs 18.4x), Revenue Growth (0.1% vs 0.2%), Gross Margin (100.0% vs 82.9%).