ABMT vs JNJ: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of Advanced Biomedical Technologies Inc and Johnson & Johnson in 2026
ABMT
Advanced Biomedical Technologies Inc
$0.00
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
$218.21
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | ABMT | JNJ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $0.01M | $525.73B | JNJ |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 21.10 | JNJ |
| EPS (TTM) | $N/A | $10.34 | JNJ |
| Revenue Growth | -0.8% | 0.1% | JNJ |
| Gross Margin | 74.3% | 68.4% | ABMT |
Analyze ABMT
Full quant analysis
Analyze JNJ
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is ABMT or JNJ a better investment?
Comparing ABMT and JNJ: Advanced Biomedical Technologies Inc has a market cap of $0.01M while Johnson & Johnson has $525.73B. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between ABMT and JNJ?
ABMT (Advanced Biomedical Technologies Inc) and JNJ (Johnson & Johnson) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: ABMT or JNJ?
Based on P/E ratios, compare detailed valuation metrics on our dashboard.
Which is growing faster: ABMT or JNJ?
JNJ has higher revenue growth at 0.1% vs -0.8% for ABMT.
Which company is more profitable: ABMT or JNJ?
Advanced Biomedical Technologies Inc (ABMT) has higher gross margins at 74.3% compared to 68.4% for JNJ.
Which is the larger company: ABMT or JNJ?
Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) is larger with a market cap of $525.73B compared to $0.01M for ABMT.
Should I buy ABMT or JNJ in 2026?
Both ABMT and JNJ have investment merit. ABMT trades at $0.00 while JNJ trades at $218.21. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between ABMT and JNJ stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($0.01M vs $525.73B), P/E Ratio (N/A vs 21.1x), Revenue Growth (-0.8% vs 0.1%), Gross Margin (74.3% vs 68.4%).