ABANF vs MSFT: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of Automatic Bank Services Limited and Microsoft Corp in 2026
ABANF
Automatic Bank Services Limited
$6.80
MSFT
Microsoft Corp
$454.79
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | ABANF | MSFT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $272.00M | $3.38T | MSFT |
| P/E Ratio | 17.89 | 36.30 | ABANF |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.38 | $13.70 | MSFT |
| Revenue Growth | 0.0% | 14.9% | MSFT |
| Gross Margin | 88.4% | 68.8% | ABANF |
Analyze ABANF
Full quant analysis
Analyze MSFT
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is ABANF or MSFT a better investment?
Comparing ABANF and MSFT: Automatic Bank Services Limited has a market cap of $272.00M while Microsoft Corp has $3.38T. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between ABANF and MSFT?
ABANF (Automatic Bank Services Limited) and MSFT (Microsoft Corp) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: ABANF or MSFT?
Based on P/E ratios, ABANF trades at a lower multiple (17.9x vs 36.3x).
Which is growing faster: ABANF or MSFT?
MSFT has higher revenue growth at 14.9% vs 0.0% for ABANF.
Which company is more profitable: ABANF or MSFT?
Automatic Bank Services Limited (ABANF) has higher gross margins at 88.4% compared to 68.8% for MSFT.
Which is the larger company: ABANF or MSFT?
Microsoft Corp (MSFT) is larger with a market cap of $3.38T compared to $272.00M for ABANF.
Should I buy ABANF or MSFT in 2026?
Both ABANF and MSFT have investment merit. ABANF trades at $6.80 while MSFT trades at $454.79. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between ABANF and MSFT stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($272.00M vs $3.38T), P/E Ratio (17.9x vs 36.3x), Revenue Growth (0.0% vs 14.9%), Gross Margin (88.4% vs 68.8%).