AACAY vs MSFT: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of AAC Technologies Holdings Inc and Microsoft Corp in 2026
AACAY
AAC Technologies Holdings Inc
$4.80
MSFT
Microsoft Corp
$444.11
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | AACAY | MSFT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.85B | $3.30T | MSFT |
| P/E Ratio | 19.38 | 32.37 | AACAY |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.26 | $14.04 | MSFT |
| Revenue Growth | 0.2% | 0.2% | Tie |
| Gross Margin | 21.7% | 68.8% | MSFT |
Analyze AACAY
Full quant analysis
Analyze MSFT
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is AACAY or MSFT a better investment?
Comparing AACAY and MSFT: AAC Technologies Holdings Inc has a market cap of $5.85B while Microsoft Corp has $3.30T. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between AACAY and MSFT?
AACAY (AAC Technologies Holdings Inc) and MSFT (Microsoft Corp) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: AACAY or MSFT?
Based on P/E ratios, AACAY trades at a lower multiple (19.4x vs 32.4x).
Which is growing faster: AACAY or MSFT?
Both AACAY and MSFT show similar growth rates. Check our detailed analysis for quarterly trends.
Which company is more profitable: AACAY or MSFT?
Microsoft Corp (MSFT) has higher gross margins at 68.8% compared to 21.7% for AACAY.
Which is the larger company: AACAY or MSFT?
Microsoft Corp (MSFT) is larger with a market cap of $3.30T compared to $5.85B for AACAY.
Should I buy AACAY or MSFT in 2026?
Both AACAY and MSFT have investment merit. AACAY trades at $4.80 while MSFT trades at $444.11. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between AACAY and MSFT stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($5.85B vs $3.30T), P/E Ratio (19.4x vs 32.4x), Revenue Growth (0.2% vs 0.2%), Gross Margin (21.7% vs 68.8%).