CHRW vs HON: Which Stock is Better?
Side-by-side comparison of C H Robinson Worldwide Inc and Honeywell International Inc in 2026
CHRW
C H Robinson Worldwide Inc
$193.32
HON
Honeywell International Inc
$243.85
Key Metrics Comparison
| Metric | CHRW | HON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $22.93B | $164.32B | HON |
| P/E Ratio | 38.74 | 32.21 | HON |
| EPS (TTM) | $4.99 | $7.57 | HON |
| Revenue Growth | -0.1% | -0.0% | HON |
| Gross Margin | 8.6% | 36.9% | HON |
Analyze CHRW
Full quant analysis
Analyze HON
Full quant analysis
Analyze Each Stock
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CHRW or HON a better investment?
Comparing CHRW and HON: C H Robinson Worldwide Inc has a market cap of $22.93B while Honeywell International Inc has $164.32B. Both companies have their strengths - use our detailed metrics comparison to make an informed decision.
What is the difference between CHRW and HON?
CHRW (C H Robinson Worldwide Inc) and HON (Honeywell International Inc) differ in valuation, growth rates, and profitability metrics. Our comparison shows which company leads in each category.
Which stock has better value: CHRW or HON?
Based on P/E ratios, HON trades at a lower multiple (32.2x vs 38.7x).
Which is growing faster: CHRW or HON?
HON has higher revenue growth at -0.0% vs -0.1% for CHRW.
Which company is more profitable: CHRW or HON?
Honeywell International Inc (HON) has higher gross margins at 36.9% compared to 8.6% for CHRW.
Which is the larger company: CHRW or HON?
Honeywell International Inc (HON) is larger with a market cap of $164.32B compared to $22.93B for CHRW.
Should I buy CHRW or HON in 2026?
Both CHRW and HON have investment merit. CHRW trades at $193.32 while HON trades at $243.85. Consider your investment goals, risk tolerance, and portfolio diversification before deciding. Our AI analysis tools can provide personalized insights.
What are the key differences between CHRW and HON stock?
Key differences: Market Cap ($22.93B vs $164.32B), P/E Ratio (38.7x vs 32.2x), Revenue Growth (-0.1% vs -0.0%), Gross Margin (8.6% vs 36.9%).